Aliens

8 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to discussing alien life. *"Reddit relies on volunteer moderators to keep the platform welcoming and free of...

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1626
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/Contactunderground on 2024-08-09 14:35:24.

Original Title: Prime Contactees are a special type of UFO experiencer. They can request UFO sightings with others present, and anomalous aerial phenomena subsequently occur. What if there is a mental link on an unconscious level between UAP intelligences & everyone who has a sighting?


A "Prime Contactee” candidate awoke from sleep & found himself in full lotus. But he reportedly never studied yoga! This suggests training at the level of the unconscious mind.

https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/01/30/contactees-identified-as-primes-are-just-the-tip-of-the-iceberg/

1627
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/TheBl4ckFox on 2024-08-09 12:32:02.

Hi. Just want to make a couple of remarks.

After entering few threads here, I feel people don't understand or want to understand what skepticism really is. It does not mean I don't want to know about aliens. In fact, the opposite is true. I have found the subject fascinating since my early childhood. That means I have been interested in this for decades and would love nothing more than to see evidence of alien life. This also means I have been disappointed countless times. I don't want to be disappointed by yet another hoax. I want confirmation of something I desperately want to be true. That means following the evidence. Hear-say is not enough. 'This dude told me on youtube' is not enough. A vague post on a weird site is not enough.

Being a skeptic does not mean 'having a closed mind'. When a skeptic asks for evidence for a claim, he is in fact fully open to new information. When you see a request for evidence and feel threatened, this is not the skeptic's doing. Maybe you don't feel so sure about your belief? Maybe you actually kind of feel you don't have evidence? Fine, but that's not the skeptic's fault. Don't get mad when someone asks you to back up a claim if you can't back up your claim.

Telling someone 'to be open minded' is rather insulting, actually. And in practice it's kind of ironic. When a skeptic asks for evidence, he shows he is willing to learn something new. But I have noticed that this demand for 'open mindedness' is a one way street. Believers demand skeptics to accept any and all story or vague youtube video as definitive proof, but any information that debunks the belief is dismissed immediately.

I've noticed discussions quickly descend into the elevator of conspiracy. It's a one way trip downwards. When I ask for evidence and the answer is: 'the evidence is suppressed by The Government / The Main Stream Media / Them' you just moved the burden of proof to a much larger unsubstantiated claim. First you only needed to prove Alien visitors. But now you need to prove a global conspiracy with infallible and all-powerful secret organisations. The end of this elevator ride down must be a level of madness where literally everyone who disagrees with you MUST be part of a big conspiracy.

Also, be aware that if you claim a big international organisation is suppressing all the evidence, and you point to a video on Youtube to back this up, you are being kind of silly. You are saying 'all the media in the world are on a leash, except the worlds biggest video site, where Joe Schmoe can just dump the biggest secrets in the world with impunity'. Just look at the way actual leaks of government secrets basically blew up in the media. There's precedent for this.

And if They are suppressing all the evidence, how do you know there is something to suppress? Wasn't it suppressed by Them?

Telling someone 'to do their own research' when they ask you for evidence means you don't have evidence to prove your claim. You are trying to send the skeptic away so he/she won't bother you any further. But it's never up to a skeptic to find evidence for YOUR claim. If you make a claim, you need to back it up. At least if you want to be taken seriously. If you don't, that's fine. But be honest about it. Say 'I really believe this and seen interesting things that make me think about certain possibilities but I have no hard proof to back it up'.

Telling a skeptic to find the proof also leads to another exhausting cycle of 'Show me the evidence' 'look for it yourself' exchanges that take way more effort than actually linking to what you consider proof. If you have it.

Be aware that if there was actual hard evidence for alien visitors, it would literally be all over the news on every channel in every country. This would be the biggest new story in human history: we are not alone. The idea that 'They' are hiding this is just another floor in the elevator ride to madness. As someone who has worked (and still works) as a journalist, I can tell you that the idea of 'Them' controlling all news is ludicrous. It's like telling a carpenter that he only uses wood because They make him use wood rather than a super secret much better hidden material.

TLDR: Basically don't shoot the messenger. If someone asks for evidence and you don't have it, be honest about that. If you have it, share it so the skeptic can examine it. If you just want to believe something without evidence, that's fine but don't get angry when someone actually does want evidence before they take your word for something.

(edit: spelling)

1628
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/Benana94 on 2024-08-09 08:51:24.

I was just listening to a David Grusch interview and then I had a thought. I wondered if biologics (i.e. humans, lifeforms, aliens, etc.) have capabilities that are inherently irreplicable by computers.

I'm wondering this in response to questions about the phenomena's interaction with life. We often wonder why aliens, let alone interdimensional beings or whatever we are dealing with, would be interested in human life. There is also debate about whether UFOs are manned, and if so why. Why would advanced life pilot ships when they could just control them remotely, or even bother with creating biological minions as some people think the greys are.

We tend to assume that technology can eventually usurp any useful function of a person, the logical conclusion being that one day you could get machines to do any tasks you'd need such as fighting, observing, surveying, etc.

But now I'm wondering if maybe there is a capability to biological lifeforms that is not necessarily replaceable or outperformed by inanimate machines. We assume AI will eventually be able to replicate the processing and decision power of our brains, but what if it isn't? What if life's ability to adapt to changing stimuli is infinite while computers will always eventually hit a roadblock? What makes me think this mostly is that it seems many non-human craft are recovered with "biologics" inside, or they seem to have been operated by them. It goes against some of our assumptions about the inferiority of living beings compared to future theoretical computers. But maybe assuming that lifeforms can be fully replaced is false.

Hope that makes sense, curious what others think.

1629
1
Weird Question (zerobytes.monster)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/SunnyDeed on 2024-08-09 02:57:55.

If we somehow in someway come in full contact with aliens, what would that mean for religion?

1630
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/Still_Silver_255 on 2024-08-09 02:15:14.

This might be a little mathy so bear with me. The Drake equation’s last 4 values are largely assumptive even by modern estimates. As a result we should go with what we do know in 2024 since we know a lot more than Drake did back in 1961.

So far according to modern science the closest known exoplanet in the habitable zone with an atmosphere is LHS 1140 b (1.4x larger than Earth by radius). An atmosphere is considered crucial by modern science to support life and this is the nearest planet which fits the criteria.

Unfortunately for the Fermi Paradox LHS 1140b is 40 light years from earth.

Using the Friis transmission equation we can deduce given the most sensitive detector we have (SETI) at 10-28 Watts the math shows that an advanced civilization would need to transmit a signal at 2.5 Trillion Watts using a directional antenna for us to detect a signal from LHS 1140b which equates to a signal with the transmission power of 200 New York Cities or 14% of the global power consumption.

The most powerful radio transmitter we’ve ever had as a species was the Arecibo Observatory planetary radar which could peak at 1 million watts which maths out to 0.00004% of the power required to transmit a signal to LHS 1140b and be detectable by our most sensitive detectors.

TL;DR the nearest habitable exo-planet with an atmosphere is 40 light years away and in order for us to detect a signal from that planet by SETI an alien species would have to point a direction transmitter at earth and transmit a signal with the power of 14% of the global power consumption with a transmitter that is 2.5 million times more power than the most powerful transmitter humanity has ever created. That’s of course assuming LHS 1140b had intelligent life on it to begin with.

1631
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/Jest_Kidding420 on 2024-08-09 01:11:13.

I know many of you may not believe any of this, but I urge you to give it a chance, look at the I information being provided and then check out the many different YouTube channels that have been calling these things in the day time capturing incredible footage, hell George Knapp just released a video about people being able to summon these things. I hope you guys enjoy.

https://youtu.be/UaTnPv_UCcA?si=exjk-73OT2dZU4o_

https://youtube.com/@skywatcheranomalous89?si=ON1qgyJopUyAHWxI

https://youtube.com/@miamiufo?si=HLjw8QUn_YqoN4H2

1632
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/pokezillaking on 2024-08-08 23:50:47.

I remember reading a YouTube comment section where I came across a theory that has stuck with me for the past few years.

It's kind of a conspiracy theory, but it suggests that governments around the world are secretly preparing for a potential alien assault—basically, an invasion. However, they’ve decided not to disclose this to the general public because they’re afraid of causing mass panic.

The idea of aliens coming to Earth and attacking us at any moment might be too much for the average person to handle. While some might cope better than others, the government isn't willing to take that risk.

The theory also claims that the reason militaries around the world are developing such advanced weapons of war is not just for human conflicts, but also in preparation for possible alien warfare. It even mentions the Battle of L.A. and the Roswell incident as "wake-up calls" for militaries worldwide to start getting ready.

Any Opinions?

1633
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/Weak-Cryptographer-4 on 2024-08-08 22:57:14.

Some of what I'm describing is not new but I've gone down a bit of a rabbit hole and want to get my thoughts out for others to shoot down or expound on.

What if the reason there can't be disclosure and there is talk of the true knowledge of what we know being "indigestible" is that we are indeed in simulation (prison planet) that the only reason that we have a concept of good and evil because it was created for us just like our simulation.

In other words, good and evil are concepts that have been given to us in order that we create energy to feed the beings responsible for our simulation/prison . What if outside this simulation there is no concept of emotion/good/evil and everything is binary for the collective or we cease to exist all together.

The ramifications are that it's better to stay here and reincarnate vs. escaping. That certain individuals know this and if the information were let loose there would be pandamonium. Imagine, do what you want, good or bad, there is no penance. You just recycle over and over again. Also, it could explain why they are so interested in our nuclear weapons. If you have wars or endless infighting, that's good for the energy they like. If we have mutual assured destruction that gets rid of the food source rather quickly.

This runs along the lines of other theories related to a prison planet, but I think puts a spin on it a bit.

Thoughts?

1634
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/Ufonauter on 2024-08-08 22:13:08.

This encounter was allegedly first published in the Portuguese magazine Galaxia 2000. However, that article is not something I could personally find. Instead, this encounter, which the basis of this post is on was published in the 1987 book ENCICLOPEDIA DE LOS ENCUENTROS CERCANOS by Vincente-Juan Ballester Olmos & Juan A.Fernandez Peris. The following text is translated from that book into English and reads as the following.

G. A. S. F., a 35-year-old civil construction technician, and a friend (who preferred not to testify), were walking from the beach area, after having been in a café until closing time, to the town of Santo Antonio da Caparica, when they observed a very intense bluish light moving across the sky at high speed. It was coming from Cape Espichel (SW direction) and appeared to be heading towards Lisbon (NE direction). It was moving at a height of 100 to 150 m over the Atlantic Ocean with a slightly downward oblique trajectory. This observation gave them a certain impression and nervousness. Suddenly, the UFO stopped, remaining completely static about 400 m away from the witnesses, and then slowly descended vertically over a wooded area next to the Orbitur campsite. Without knowing why, both began to run in the direction of the light along Dr. Castro Freire Street leading to the grove, entering it.

The luminosity given off by the UFO was enough to allow them to walk among the trees (acacias, of small size) and bushes. When they reached a clearing crossed by a narrow asphalt road that led from Santo Antonio to the beach (located about 100 m away from there), they saw on the other side of the road, about 8 m away, a figure that "horrified" them. It was a being of absolutely human appearance, about 2.30 m tall. It was dressed in a suit "like the one used by firemen in fire fighting, made of asbestos", slightly soiled and of a very bright white color. His head was covered by a kind of helmet, "similar to a motorcycle helmet", also white and shiny, with a narrow dark visor, "as if it were made of glass", at eye level. He was standing facing the witnesses, who had the impression that his presence had caused as much surprise to them as his presence had caused to them. He began to turn very slowly, "heavily", from left to right and took a step in the direction of the UFO, always with his hands still and his arms down. It made no sound whatsoever.

The object was static at a height of 10 to 12 m and approximately 16 m behind the being. It appeared to be "flattened in shape, with a higher part in the center", measuring 25 to 30 m in length and 5 to 6 m in height. Its intense bluish luminosity prevented them from appreciating any other detail of it. After a few seconds, the witnesses became frightened and fled the scene. The night was clear, very cold, with no moon and the stars could be seen.

https://preview.redd.it/gitob44ciihd1.jpg?width=907&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1ae3e2d4d8bca3af1f5e0c71914d7e50bdab9fdf

The next day the two friends returned to the site, observing in the clearing of the grove an area of 8 m in diameter where the grasses were crushed, this crushing reaching beyond the perimeter of the clearing, being visible under the acacias, whose branches were not broken or bent. Local investigators visited the area on February 27, and found nothing abnormal in the appearance of the grasses or the trees on the site.

https://preview.redd.it/xfkz7e0hiihd1.png?width=863&format=png&auto=webp&s=882ff11f2c6f52d620a6da2dc371635f98846f3f

During the seconds of observation in the forest clearing, G. A. S. F. felt a buzzing sound and a pressure inside his head, which intensified as he approached the site. For several weeks he suffered from insomnia, "sleeping barely two hours a night" (without a sleeping pill - "Lorenin" - being effective), as well as nervous depression. His co-workers noticed a change in his normal behavior. One month after the events he was still not fully recovered.

Now while this encounter is nothing revelatory or particularly exciting beyond the concept of such an experience, the next section is where perhaps this story goes from a once-over, to one that perhaps should be taken more seriously.

As far as I can tell (and feel free to correct me on this if anyone finds otherwise) but the only link to the following images comes from a MUFON report https://updb.app/report/1-101220 stating "TALL ALIEN CAUGHT ON CAM Pictures I don't know about the Elevation - Degrees"

https://preview.redd.it/xw3ps3txjihd1.jpg?width=616&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bafba2ce6fe5dc13a61e81242d1e4560994f32df

https://preview.redd.it/co8o14txjihd1.jpg?width=592&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=af211c560101998b8f67ab5d09fe8837da61203a

Comparison

This is by no means something definitive, but it is interesting to compare them side-by-side. If I can scrounge up any more info relating to the photographs or if anyone else finds more information on this I will make an edit to this post.

1635
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/howmanyturtlesdeep on 2024-08-08 20:53:43.
1636
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/DragonfruitOdd1989 on 2024-08-08 20:16:35.

https://preview.redd.it/rfwtjhl60ihd1.png?width=2994&format=png&auto=webp&s=a422c91f48f4ff5a46b767164e039ce554aaf5b3

One of the biggest complaints against the discovery of the Nazca Mummies is the unavailability of the DICOM files online. These files were previously shared on the internet, and thanks to the Wayback Machine, we can still access them.

Please note the following warning that accompanied these files when they were shared publicly:

"These documents can be used in a strictly personal context. They are the exclusive property of the Inkari Institute – Cusco. Any total or partial reproduction of their content, on any medium of communication whatsoever, without the express permission of the Inkari – Cusco Institute is liable to prosecution."

If you would like to access the files, you can do so through the Wayback Machine. Please visit the archived page here.

To download specific files, use the following steps:

  1. Go to the Wayback Machine link provided.
  2. Locate the URL you are interested in and remove the initial Wayback Machine part (https://web.archive.org/web/20201029230304/).
  3. Your final URL should look like this: https://www.the-alien-project.com/documents/DUMMY.zip (This is just an example).

Have Fun!

1637
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/Ricosantos27 on 2024-08-08 19:54:13.
1638
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/NewParadigmInstitute on 2024-08-08 16:20:09.
1639
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/Dmans99 on 2024-08-08 14:36:02.
1640
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/VolarRecords on 2024-08-08 07:40:48.
1641
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/llTeddyFuxpinll on 2024-08-08 06:48:12.

Original Title: My mind keeps coming back to the 'Cube-in-a-Sphere' Ryan Graves testified to. I've seen them over and over in crop circles and UAP/NHI encounter stories. Something tells me they are big piece of the puzzle.

1642
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/VolarRecords on 2024-08-08 06:35:30.
1643
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/DragonfruitOdd1989 on 2024-08-08 02:20:21.
1644
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/Ricosantos27 on 2024-08-07 16:29:31.
1645
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/AgingWisdom on 2024-08-08 02:00:24.

Guys and Gals,

this is real shit, keep it together!

Hypothesis on Underground Reptilian Evolution

Introduction

The hypothesis that an advanced subterranean reptilian species could exist today is based on principles of evolution and the survival mechanisms of various species. Evolution through natural selection has driven the diversification of life on Earth, resulting in significant evolutionary transformations. Examples include the evolution of humans from early primates, birds from theropod dinosaurs, and blue whales from terrestrial mammals. If certain reptiles sought shelter underground after the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event, they could have evolved over millions of years into intelligent, sophisticated beings. This scenario, while speculative, is grounded in evolutionary science, comparative examples from other species, and numerous credible reports from military personnel, PhDs, pilots, and government officials. This paper integrates scientific principles and credible witness accounts to present a comprehensive hypothesis.

Background on Evolutionary Principles

Evolution through natural selection is a fundamental process by which species adapt to their environments over time. This process can lead to significant physical and behavioral changes, particularly in isolated or extreme environments. The idea that reptiles could evolve underground follows these principles, considering the survival strategies and adaptability of life on Earth.

Hypothesis: Reptilian Evolution Underground

Initial Survival and Isolation

After the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event, some reptiles may have sought refuge underground to escape harsh surface conditions. This isolation would have subjected them to unique selective pressures, driving significant evolutionary changes.

Initial Conditions:

Shelter Seeking: The event that caused the extinction of the dinosaurs left the surface environment inhospitable, driving some reptiles to seek shelter underground (Alvarez et al., 1980). These underground environments provided protection from predators, extreme weather, and resource scarcity.

Initial Traits: These reptiles would retain basic traits such as scales, cold-blooded metabolism, and reliance on specific environmental conditions for survival (Benton, 2003).

Physical Adaptations Over Time

Over millions of years, these reptiles would undergo several physical adaptations to thrive in their subterranean environment.

Skin and Protection:

Thick, Durable Skin: Evolving thick, durable skin or scales to protect against abrasions from rocks and other underground hazards (King, 1980). This adaptation is similar to how modern burrowing animals, like the armadillo, have developed armor-like skin.

Camouflage: Developing adaptive camouflage to blend into their surroundings, aiding in both predator avoidance and hunting (Hibbard & Meserve, 1982). This could be similar to how cave-dwelling salamanders have evolved to match their environment.

Sensory Enhancements:

Enhanced Eyesight: Developing large, sensitive eyes for low-light conditions or evolving alternative sensory mechanisms like heightened smell and hearing (Niemiller & Poulson, 2010). This adaptation is seen in nocturnal animals like owls and bats.

Vibration Detection: Evolving highly sensitive skin or specialized organs to detect vibrations, helping them navigate and communicate in the dark (Bachmann, 2000). This is similar to how moles and some fish detect movements.

Respiratory and Moisture Adaptations:

Efficient Respiration: Developing more efficient respiratory systems to cope with potentially low-oxygen environments (Baker & Boswell, 2015). This can be seen in lungfish, which have adapted to survive in oxygen-poor water.

Moisture Retention: Evolving waterproof skin or specialized glands to manage moisture levels, preventing dehydration (Gans, 1974). Amphibians, such as frogs, have developed similar adaptations to manage their hydration levels.

Behavioral and Cognitive Evolution

The unique challenges of the underground environment would also drive significant behavioral and cognitive adaptations.

Social Structures:

Complex Social Systems: Developing complex social structures for cooperation and survival, including hierarchies and communal living arrangements (Jarvis, 1981). This is evident in species like naked mole-rats, which exhibit eusocial behavior.

Communication: Evolving sophisticated methods of communication, possibly including vocalizations, body language, and bioluminescence (Hastings & Case, 1976). Fireflies use bioluminescence for communication and mating, demonstrating how light production can evolve.

Problem-Solving and Tool Use:

Advanced Cognitive Abilities: Evolving advanced problem-solving skills and higher cognitive functions to navigate their complex environment (Emery & Clayton, 2004). Corvids, such as crows and ravens, show remarkable problem-solving abilities and tool use.

Tool Use: Developing the ability to use and create tools for various purposes, including hunting, building, and defending themselves (Lefebvre et al., 2002). Primates, including chimpanzees, use tools to obtain food and solve problems.

Hypothetical Advanced Abilities

Given enough time and evolutionary pressure, these subterranean reptiles could develop advanced abilities, both biological and technological.

Energy and Frequency Control:

Technological Mastery: Gaining a deep understanding of physics and energy, potentially leading to the development of technology to manipulate various forms of energy (Van Lommel et al., 2001). Human advancements in electromagnetic technologies, such as radio and microwaves, illustrate the potential.

Frequency Control: Learning to control electromagnetic frequencies, possibly influencing human perceptions and thoughts (Nash & Witte, 1999). Research into brainwave entrainment suggests that specific frequencies can affect cognitive states.

Mind Influence:

Neurological Understanding: Developing an advanced understanding of brainwaves and neurology, enabling them to subtly influence human thoughts through frequency manipulation (Persinger, 2001). Studies on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) demonstrate the potential to influence brain activity.

Psychological Influence: Using advanced techniques to project suggestions or influence emotions, potentially explaining accounts of telepathic communication and mind control (McCreery & Claridge, 1996). Hypnotic techniques show how suggestion can alter perception and behavior.

Comparative Examples from Evolution

Existing Subterranean Species

To ground this hypothesis, we can look at existing species that have adapted to subterranean environments and exhibit significant evolutionary changes.

Mole Rats:

Reduced Vision: Many mole rats have evolved to have reduced or non-functional eyes, relying more on touch and hearing (Bennett & Faulkes, 2000). This adaptation allows them to thrive in complete darkness.

Social Structures: Some species, like the naked mole-rat, have developed complex eusocial structures, similar to those of ants and bees (Jarvis, 1981). These social systems facilitate cooperation and division of labor.

Cave Fish:

Loss of Pigmentation: Many cave-dwelling fish have lost their pigmentation, becoming albino due to the lack of light (Niemiller & Poulson, 2010). This adaptation reduces energy expenditure on unnecessary traits.

Enhanced Sensory Systems: These fish often have enhanced lateral line systems to detect vibrations and navigate in complete darkness (Parzefall, 2000). This allows them to sense their environment without relying on vision.

Olm (Proteus anguinus):

Extended Lifespan: The olm, a cave-dwelling amphibian, has evolved to have an extended lifespan, possibly due to the stable, low-predation environment (Sket, 1997). This demonstrates how longevity can evolve in stable environments.

Reduced Eyesight: Similar to other cave dwellers, the olm has reduced eyesight and relies on other senses (Sket, 1997). This highlights how sensory adaptations can compensate for the loss of vision.

Technological Analogies

We can also draw analogies from human technological development to speculate on the potential abilities of advanced subterranean reptiles.

Bioluminescence:

Natural Examples: Many marine species use bioluminescence for communication and hunting (Hastings & Case, 1976). An advanced reptilian species could evolve similar abilities.

Technological Use: Humans have developed bioluminescent markers for scientific purposes. Reptilians might use bioluminescence for complex signaling and interaction (Wilson & Hastings, 1998).

Energy Manipulation:

Human Technology: We have developed technologies to manipulate electromagnetic frequencies (e.g., radio, microwaves) (Freeman et al., 2003). Advanced reptiles might take this further.

Frequency Influence: Understanding of brainwaves and neurology could lead to the ability to influence thoughts and emotions through targeted frequencies (Persinger, 2001).

Alignment with Witness Accounts and Stories

Witness Accounts

Many people have reported encounters with reptilian beings, describing them as intelligent and capable of advanced communication. While these accounts are anecdotal, they provide a framework for considering the evolutionary pathways that could lead to such beings.

Telepathic Communication:

Mind Influence: Advanced understanding of brainwaves could explain repo...


Content cut off. Read original on https://old.reddit.com/r/aliens/comments/1emu0q8/advanced_beings_beneath_our_feet_scientific/

1646
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/pokezillaking on 2024-08-07 22:32:30.
1647
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/jebbanagea on 2024-08-07 21:30:27.

Bet many of you never knew this….never thought of this.

1648
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/Pleasant-Lie-9053 on 2024-08-07 18:12:26.
1649
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/Mostupidquestions on 2024-08-07 17:29:51.

I'm already here I don't want the bush league stuff. Anyone know of any rabbit holes? Anything not commonly discussed here?? I wanna go deep.

1650
 
 
The original post: /r/aliens by /u/Complex-Category-354 on 2024-08-07 17:13:12.

As with all of you, I am very fascinated by this topic. There is a lot to digest as far as content. What methods do you use to advance your learning and generally do research? I was thinking about collecting stories where I can connect the dots, but if so much of the stuff out there are lies and horseshit, using traditional journalist type methods won't work.

If time and money were not a limiting factor, what methods would you use? Legally, of course. Do I set up a telescope on my roof and set it to record in a high-res 24/7?

view more: ‹ prev next ›