Hello everyone,
This is the first in hopefully a series of posts, which aims to tackle the disinformation, misinformation and wild speculation distracting those following the UAP topic, from getting to the truth of what is happening, which is making this topic seem more like crazy, unconstrained entertainment, rather than the more serious "biggest story in human history"!
I have been considering for some time whether I should share a series of rationales, informal analyses, findings, etc which guide me in my search for the truth about UAPs, NHI and the universe around us.
The motivation is to help others find their way in a complex domain, by giving the benefit of my own research into various aspects of the Phenomena (plural, deliberately). The hope is to perhaps provide more robust thinking, stronger analysis, and some practical logic and rationale for thinking through the various events, news and hypothises related to the topic of UAP and NHI.
Why listen to what I have to say? What do I know about anything?
Well, I have a high technology background as well as a very senior large business background. Hence, I have a professional understanding of topics like AI, hardware technology, software technology, as well as experience of running and transforming businesses at up to executive and CEO level within large companies and institutions. I have a scientific education and at one point collaborated with the Turing Institute designing a new robotic sensor for robot "fingers" and a new software/hardware interface to integrate into their robotics lab. In the first year of my professional career I invented some novel technology, for which I was awarded a patent. In addition, I have physics and mathematics background although I am fairly new to Quantum Mechanics but I have enough knowledge to have developed strong views on areas which relate to the UAP topic. Also, I have worked for a number of large corporations, in various sectors, who are household names and also worked in a few startups.
Sometimes my work has been and is international, meaning I have lived snd worked abroad, therefore I also have a multicultural perspective. Don't have a strong government nor military background, although have worked with some major government bodies and I coincidentally have unique insights into certain security/military operations which helps me understand certain aspects of the Legacy Program. Finally, over a 3 year period, I led the development and delivery of a new Supercomputer system, including the chip development of a novel CPU architecture and other bespoke chip designs. However, biology and non-human entities are a weak point, so I can't assess recent whistle-blowers who may be studying "biologics". Therefore, I won't be saying much in that area except perhaps more generalised views and findings.
So what? You're not impressed?
Well, the reason for laying all that out was not to impress, but to give you some level of confidence in trusting the posts I aim to publish. And I don't think my history it's particularly traceable, except for those who know me particularly well. I simply wish to demonstrate that I have the knowledge and capability to understand a wide array of topics and I am used to complexity and detailed analysis. In fact, it's one of my professional skillsets. Thus, diving into the UAP topic and all it's history and data,, evidence, speculations, etc, is no problem for me. I am able to make sense of complex situations and get to the underlying importance of specific information or events. I do that professionally.
So hopefully you may be convinced that I may be worth listening to. If not, that's fine, just move on. I may not get everything right or be fully informed when I believe I am, however you can trust anything I am posting has a decent level of rigour to get to the information or proposed answers I put forwards.
Unlike the majority of Redditors posting every day. I have at least laid out the rationale for why it may be worth reading my posts. Rather than random, fly past speculators, who post wild ideas and just expect people to accept and agree with them.
Caveat emptor: it's still only casual hypothesis, assessments or conclusions that I will post. It is still only my opinion based on the information that I have consumed and analysed, so can be biased or incorrect. These are not peer reviewed scientific papers or legal binding analysis and recommendations.
Please comment respectfully. I am OK with constructive criticism but not plain dismissal, or trolling. Of you have a better or more accurate view then please explain it and how you arrived there. I'm interested in reasoned, logical argument. Not emotional battles about who is right or wrong! Although, you will see me use emotional language for effect in my posts.
Hence, this is going to be my first, short trial post...
MANY WORLDS (and why it is not a source of UAP or NHI)
This is a short analysis to get the ball rolling.
Wikipedia definition:
"The many-worlds interpretation (MWI) is a philosophical position about how the mathematics used in quantum mechanics relates to physical reality. It asserts that the universal wavefunction is objectively real, and that there is no wave function collapse.[1] This implies that all possible outcomes of quantum measurements are physically realized in some "world" or universe.[2] In contrast to some other interpretations of quantum mechanics, the evolution of reality as a whole in MWI is rigidly deterministic[1]: 9 and local.[3] Many-worlds is also called the relative state formulation or the Everett interpretation, after physicist Hugh Everett, who first proposed it in 1957.[4][5] Bryce DeWitt popularized the formulation and named it many-worlds in the 1970s.[6][1][7][8]"
Let's cut through all the philosophy and pontificating. Many Worlds is not founded on feasiblity. It is flawed and cannot possibly be correct. It is bandied around as a potential source of interaction with our planet. The multi-verse! It is unfortunately sci-fi. (Although, not ruling out the possibility of another parallel universe somewhere, just not created by quantum effects.)
No, you must be wrong I hear? Unfortunately, Sean Carrol and other people like him are pushing this concept but in fact they should be laughed of their jobs. Human science has very little understanding of how QM works. Grasping at Many Worlds is an example of perhaps over reliance on mathematics as a modelling tool, or simply creating bad quantum models, and definitely a lack of ingenuity of our latest crop of theoretical physicists (and philosophers) from the past decades since Einstein and Bohr passed away.
Just because a particle moves around randomly in a probabilistic wave, and we only see where it is and it's state when we messure it, does not mean anything gets created because it's state was "superimposed", or not known until decoherence. Especially not, a "whole new planet" and ergo a new parallel universe for that planet?? Most lay people would have thought that crazy last century and I must say they would be correct. Today, there appears to be too much of an open mind on certain theories, which doesn't serve us well in homing in on the truth and understanding the universe. It just pollutes the problem space!
We need a better mathematical description if it's the probabilistic equations that are driving this frankly, ridiculous theory. Not just accept that a parallel world with another version of you is suddenly created. What?? Yes, that's what this theory is also proposing. Many yous!!
If creating multiple versions of you wasn't mad enough. Many Worlds is actually physically impossible. Why you ask? Because generating a new world branch whenever there is a decoherence of a particle state would give infinity new worlds starting from just after the big bang. Many Worlds doesn't need living entities to create more new worlds, just matter containing quantum particles which decohere! Such as stars and planets.
The outcome of Many Worlds, would be that since the big bang, 13 billions of years worth of "branching" would have taken place, creating a number so large it may as well be infinity. So there are supposedly infinity new parallel worlds sitting somewhere, in which their quantum processes create more new worlds, and because it is always branching in two, it's a doubling process, thus exponentially growing every second there is a relevant quantum event. If things weren't bad enough with this theory!
So we are expected to believe that an infinite number of parallel worlds have been created to date, and an exponential number of infinite worlds will be created in future. Constantly growing and never shrinking. In an infinitely large space big enough to house infinity times infinity worlds, and by association an infinite number of parallel universes! Hmmmm...
I hope by following this explanation that you csn see that the logic is completely flawed and the process they are describing is simply physically and logically impossible. No matter how big you think the universe is, this whole idea is ridiculous and should be thrown out along with physicists who support it. Just because theoretical physicists or media scientists are spouting it does not mean it is a plausible concept, nor correct in it's initial assumptions, which must clearly be driving the idea from some misunderstanding of how QM works.
The driving premise cannot, on the outcome...
Content cut off. Read original on https://old.reddit.com/r/aliens/comments/1dx4tgk/simplifying_the_problem_space_post_1_many_worlds/
