Cryptocurrency News & Discussion

42 readers
1 users here now

The leading community for cryptocurrency news, discussion, and analysis.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
101
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/CryptoDaily- on 2024-01-22 00:01:07+00:00.


Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.


 

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.


 

Rules:

  • All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
  • Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
  • Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
  • Comments will be sorted by newest first.

 

Useful Links:


 

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

102
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/kirtash93 on 2024-01-21 21:06:16+00:00.

103
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/SpaceBrigadeVHS on 2024-01-21 05:12:14+00:00.

104
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/SpaceBrigadeVHS on 2024-01-21 03:50:45+00:00.

105
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/travelerlifts07 on 2024-01-21 02:57:46+00:00.


Source: Coinbase Bytes Newsletter

Copied and paste from it since no images are allowed here anymore:

Ethereum fees could fall dramatically

In the coming months, Ethereum is expected to launch its EIP-4844 upgrade, which, according to a prediction from asset manager VanEck, will "reduce transaction fees and improve scalability for layer 2 chains such as Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism."The upgrade, also known as proto-danksharding, is the next evolution of technology that splits the network into many "shards" to allow for ever faster transactions. Bitwise predicts the upgrade could drive the average fee per transaction down from around $0.14 on "low-cost Layer 2 blockchains" to below $0.01: "A 90%+ reduction in the cost to use Ethereum will radically increase the types of activities individuals can feasibly participate in on the network." This potential leap has JPMorgan predicting that ETH could outperform bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in 2024.

Governments will adopt blockchains

Belgium plans to use its 2024 presidency of the European Union Council to push for building a trans-national blockchain that will be used to store things like driver's licenses and property titles for EU residents.

106
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/cryptolibertatum on 2024-01-21 00:00:21+00:00.


Soon to be regretted in a few years or less.

107
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/6M66 on 2024-01-20 23:18:55+00:00.


When we tried to withdraw some Eth, it is costing us $33/transaction, if we do test, that's $33*2= $66. And that's the price when gas fee is 13gwei.

And we are forced to use ERC 20

Imagine how expensive that will be when gas fee goes up.

For those people who do dollar cost average. How are you cool with paying that amount for a transaction

I am in constant look of an exchange with reasonable fees.

Some of these exchanges have up to 2% spread to buy and 2% to sell .

That means if you trade 100k, you pay 2k to buy and 2k to sell. I call that rip-off.

On top of that they charge for withdrawal of fiat to your bank.

So exchange business must be really profitable. They are popping up everywhere.

It's sad Binance is not available anymore.

I am not comfortable paying that much at all. I don't know why nobody talks about this.

Wait, it's not all, aside from all these fees cost of hard wallet and tax software that must be paid annually.

We spend so much money on this, yet nobody mentions it..

I definitely think ETFs are needed Here.as long as they track the coin well. My biggest problem with ETF is, it's not 24/7.

Edit: I always say this , Eth is for rich people who are willing to pay hundreds of dollar as fee . This can't be sustainable.

108
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/Joe-M-4 on 2024-01-20 13:18:05+00:00.


EXPERIMENT - Tracking Top 10 Cryptos Of 2023 - ONE YEAR REPORT – UP 73%

Find the full blog post with all the tables and graphs here.

Welcome to your monthly no-shill data dump: Here's the YEAR END REPORT for the 2023 Top Ten Experiment featuring BTC, ETH, BNB, XRP, BUSD, DOGE, ADA, MATIC, DOT, and LTC.

SNAPSHOTS ALWAYS TAKEN ON FIRST OF THE MONTH (data below reflects 1 JANUARY Snapshot).

tl;dr

  • What's this all about? I purchased $100 of each of Top 10 Cryptos in Jan. 2018, haven't sold or traded, reporting monthly for nearly 6 years for your reading pleasure. Did the same in 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023. Learn more about the history and rules of the Experiments (including why in the world I would include stablecoins) here. Learn more about the new features in the 2023 Top Ten Experiment here.
  • DECEMBER Highlights: Gotta love ending 2023 on an all green month. ADA takes its second straight monthly victory, followed by DOT.
  • The 2023 portfolio is +73% so far this year compared to +24% from the S&P500. DCA'ing once a year into Top Ten Cryptos for the last 6 years has produced better returns than if you'd done the same with the S&P 500 over the same time period (+163% vs S&P500's +45% - see below for details).
  • Total market cap token AMKT is nearly doubled the ROI of the 2023 Top 10 Experiment +141% to +73% in this year’s friendly competition between The Top Ten Portfolio and The Alongside Crypto Market Index Token (AMKT).

Month Twelve – Up +73%

The 2023 Top Ten Crypto Index Fund Portfolio is BTC, ETH, BNB, XRP, BUSD, DOGE, ADA, MATIC, DOT, LTC.

December highlights for the 2023 Top Ten Portfolio:

  • A strong/all green month to end 2023
  • ADA takes its second monthly victory in a row, followed closely by DOT in second place
  • End of year champ: BTC holds off second place ADA for the 2023 victory

December Rankings

Here’s a look at the movement in the ranks twelve months into the 2023 Top Ten Index Fund Experiment:

December Winners and Losers

December Winner – ADA (+67%) outperformed the field this month for the second month in a row, followed by DOT (+62%).

December Loser – at +4%, XRP turned in the worst performance of the month.

Overall Update: BTC takes the yearly victory followed by second place ADA.  Litecoin finishes in last place. 100% of cryptos in the green.

Bitcoin (+173%) was the best performing Top Ten crypto of 2023, followed by second place ADA (+158%).  The initial $100 invested in BTC twelve months ago is worth $272 today. 

All Top Ten cryptos finished in positive territory this year.

Litecoin was the worst performer of this year’s Top Ten Experiment, up just +8%.

Overall return on $1,000 investment since January 1st, 2023:

The 2023 Top Ten Portfolio picked up $344 bucks in December and ended the month at a yearly high.  The initial $1000 investment on New Year’s Day 2023 is now worth $1,729, +73% this year.

Here’s a visual summary of year one of the 2023 Top Ten portfolio:

2023 Top Ten Portfolio vs. The Alongside Crypto Market Index Token (AMKT)

The first Top Ten Crypto Experiment was started on 1 January 2018 in an attempt to capture the gains of the entire market. Much has changed over the last six years, including the introduction of index products designed to capture the entire crypto market (instead of manually buying coins and tokens like I do for my Experiments).

This year’s friendly competition is between The 2023 Top Ten Portfolio and The Alongside Crypto Market Index Token (AMKT).  AMKT is an ERC-20 token that represents a cap weighted index of 15 Cryptocurrencies (minus stablecoins) backed 1:1 by the underlying assets represented within the index and completely onchain.  Since the index represents approximately 95% of the value within crypto, AMKT is an excellent proxy for the entire cryptocurrency market – exactly what my Top Ten Portfolios have been trying to recreate from the start.  

To mirror traditional index fund products, AMKT also provides a 5% APR match, creating its own dividend.

Here’s the question I tracked this year: would I have been better off with $1,000 of AMKT instead of creating a homemade $1,000 Top Ten Index Fund?

On 1 January 2023, $1000 was equal to 17.15 AMKT.  Here’s the snapshot, one year later: 

December Performances:

  • The 2023 Top Ten Portfolio: +25%
  • AMKT: +18%

The monthly victory goes to: The 2023 Top Ten Portfolio

FINAL TALLY FOR 2023: 

  • The 2023 Top Ten Portfolio: current value $1,729 (+73%)
  • AMKT: current value $2,407 (+141%)

Overall winner: The Alongside Crypto Market Index Token (AMKT)

For the more visual, here’s the table I used to track the friendly Top Ten vs. AMKT competition this year:

That’s a wrap on the 2023 Top Ten vs. AMKT competition.  In the end, it really wasn’t close – AMKT took 9 out of 12 monthly victories and held the overall lead throughout 2023, returning +141% vs. my Top Ten’s 73%.

Not bad for doing nothing.

Combining the 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 Top Ten Crypto Portfolios

The 2023 Top Ten is one of six concurrent experimental portfolios.  Where do we stand if we combine all of the Top Ten Crypto Index Fund Experiments?

  • 2018 Top Ten Experiment: down -10% (total value $903)
  • 2019 Top Ten Experiment: up +355% (total value $4,548)
  • 2020 Top Ten Experiment: up +474% (total value $5,739) (best performing portfolio*)*
  • 2021 Top Ten Experiment: up +139% (total value $2,393)
  • 2022 Top Ten Experiment: down -52% (total value $484) (worst performing portfolio*)*
  • 2023 Top Ten Experiment: up +73% (total value $1,729)

Taking the six portfolios together, here’s the bottom bottom bottom bottom bottom bottom line: 

After a $6,000 total investment in the 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 Top Ten Cryptocurrencies, the combined portfolios are worth $15,796.

That’s up +163% on the combined portfolios.   

For context, the peak  for the combined Top Ten Index Fund Experiment Portfolios was November 2021’s all time high of +533%.  

Here’s the combined monthly ROI since I started tracking the metric in January 2020 for those who do better with visuals:

In summary: That’s a +163% gain by investing $1k on whichever cryptos happened to be in the Top Ten on January 1st (including stablecoins) for six straight years.

Comparison to S&P 500

I’m also tracking the S&P 500 as part of my Experiment to have a comparison point to traditional markets.

The S&P 500 is up +24% so far in 2023, compared to the Top Ten Crypto portfolio’s +73%.  The initial $1k investment into crypto on New Year’s Day would be worth $1,240 had it been redirected to the S&P.  

Taking the same invest-$1,000-on-January-1st-of-each-year approach with the S&P 500 that I’ve been documenting through the Top Ten Crypto Experiments, the yields are the following:

  • $1000 investment in S&P 500 on January 1st, 2018 = $1,780 today
  • $1000 investment in S&P 500 on January 1st, 2019 = $1,900 today
  • $1000 investment in S&P 500 on January 1st, 2020 = $1,480 today
  • $1000 investment in S&P 500 on January 1st, 2021 = $1,270 today
  • $1000 investment in S&P 500 on January 1st, 2022 = $1000 today
  • $1000 investment in S&P 500 on January 1st, 2023 = ...

Content cut off. Read original on https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/19bbkvm/i_bought_1k_of_the_top_10_cryptos_on_january_1st/

109
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/morrisdev on 2024-01-21 19:11:15+00:00.


I have my own little business and have been dabbling in crypto for fun since it came out. Now, I've had some customers talk about using it in their database systems.

I like ETH and ADA, but I pretty much just sit on it. I figured we'd do some testing with smart contracts to shot the client as examples.

The gas price on Eth was pretty high or the speed was unacceptable. So, I don't get it? I like my portfolio getting bigger and all, but I invested in it SOLELY because I saw it as a technology that would dominate the automation of financial software. But now.... Not so much.

Ada is super fast and cheap in comparison, but I don't know haskell or Rust, but I certainly don't want to spend 200k writing a software that's going to be inefficient or even irrelevant in a matter of years.

Ugh. I'm really disappointed here.

I now know "why" gas is expensive and people have told me 100 ways to bundle, etc... And even more have tried to push me on using chains like sol and nano and xrp, and I guess I'll need to research them. The thing that is driving me crazy:

If the gas fee is so high due to the networks transaction volume, why do people "transact"?. I just sit on mine, so I never even noticed. I just see the balance go up. But, who the F actually "uses" ETH when deciding to send someone $50 or something? Why would anyone actually "use" ETH to send someone money?

I must be doing something wrong. I'm praying I'm doing something wrong, because if it's just good for holding, then the justification I used for investing in it is completely wrong.

Something.... One of these chains... Is going to become the standard when developing software. AWS S3 pretty much standardized storage for us. S3 and Azure and Google Cloud Storage are practically identical, dominating software. A million other options just died in ignominy.

So, Why do people "transact" in Eth rather than chains that are literally thousands of percent cheaper and faster? Is there a reason I'm missing?

110
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/DrDynamicyt on 2024-01-21 18:18:31+00:00.

111
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/saltmurai on 2024-01-21 18:00:48+00:00.


I'm a software developer for a former blockchain company. Few weeks ago, out of nowhere my boss being super hyped about this Blast L2 things that is very trending on Twitter. At the point of speaking, it has attracted $1.1 billion TVL and has launched a test net. My boss told our team to stop working on whatever we are building and work on a new project on top of this Blast thing. But me and my coworkers can't wrap our heads around how is this thing legit and why people are putting money into something as vague as this Blast thing is. I've no experience in crypto and web3 prior so I'm posting it here to get some insights, since I'm very concerned that my team are working on what basically is a scam. Thanks in advance.

112
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/operablesocks on 2024-01-21 17:35:13+00:00.


Basically, the German CEO, Horst Jicha, finally after 6 years, tried coming back into the US a few weeks ago through Miami, which triggered his immediate arrest, and he's now up in in a Brooklyn jail, awaiting trial. The DOJ estimates Horst and the other owners (Ralf Gold and Joao Severino) took in over $150M during their 2017 scam, and they've set up an email address specifically for those who lost money to their scam.

If you know anyone who lost money to the USI Tech/Tech Coin combo scam, have them email that specific address they mention in the above link. To avoid phone tag, have them include the following info:

Full birth name, phone, email, mailing address, and approx $ amount that was lost.

There's never any promises when it comes to claw back victim restitution cases like this. Horst and his cohorts may have lost most of it, or spent it on lifestyle. But the same New York FBI unit was able to claw back over 90% of the money that victims in the Bernie Madoff's scam had invested. Hope this info helps 100s of others. 👍

113
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/SatoshiFlex on 2024-01-21 17:12:37+00:00.


CruxDecussata is a privacy-focused cypherpunk project that has announced its standalone privacy Layer 1 chain, and encrypted messenger app. Here's some info to get you up to speed:

[Project & Domain Background]

CruxDecussata.com owns the unique domain ☓.com (est. 2005), which is widely recognized as the Saltire or Crux Decussata. Its punycode is xn--33h.com and is distinct from Elon Musk's x.com

☓.com was the domain for Herbert Sim's Crypto Chain University(CCU)—a space dedicated to research and collaboration among cypherpunks, among whom Satoshi Nakamoto was an eminent member.

[Dev & Launch]

CruxDecussata's anonymous founder CP33 acquired the domain URL xn--33h.com in July 2023 and stealth-launched the $X token in August 2023.

At launch, the dev inscribed on the Ethereum blockchain that 66.6% of sales proceeds will go to holders of the $X token. CruxDecussata’s flagship app, XMessenger, also rewards $X holders a 60% share of its generated revenue.

[XMessenger & Xchain]

XMessenger is a privacy-focused messaging platform with non-KYC login, free encrypted messaging, and untraceable ZK cross-chain transfers. Its upcoming suite of functionality includes anonymous cross-chain swaps and privacy mixer, and is facilitated and secured by CruxDecussata’s standalone Layer 1: Xchain.

Xchain secures XMessenger’s attestation layer, and employs a Byzantine Fault Tolerance consensus method (a recognised battle-tested consensus mechanism) with a GLS layer to ensure security, scalable efficiency and absolute privacy at high volumes.

XMessenger rewards token holders with a 60% share of the platform's generated revenue, and 30% of revenue from each transaction is used to buyback and burn $X tokens.

114
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/Envarion on 2024-01-21 16:09:58+00:00.


Hi all. I'm looking to up the security of my holdings and want to do things in the best possible way. I wanna go full-paranoid mode. Here's what I have in mind:

I am looking for an (android?) device that is physically incapable of wireless comms: no BT, wifi, or celular. Or a device that can be modified to physically remove these features permanently. But it needs NFC since I want to use it to program Tangem cards.

That's it: NFC capable (to set up Tangem via side-loaded app), but otherwise fully HARDWARE air-gapped (for seed generation).

I'm not interested in any software solutions to airgap the device. (That means: no airplane mode, no custom ROMs, no router configuration to block the device-- I want it to be physically impossible for the device to ever connect anywhere)

Here are the options I've explored so far and my concerns:

Buy a small laptop and remove the wireless adapters - This will work for seed generation, but there doesn't seem to be any way to use NFC with an emulated android app. Would need a usb NFC antenna and an emulator that supports the feature and that particular hardware. If anyone knows any solutions to this I'd be very interested since this would be the easiest option for me.

Pinephone - A phone that has physical kill switches for wireless comms. Really cool idea, but I don't know that these switches don't just tell the software to turn things off. Phone doesn't support NFC natively and the idea for an attachable NFC cover won't be coming to fruition.

Buy and modify a phone that supports NFC - Preferably something with a higher level of 'repairability,' although this isn't a huge factor. And with discrete and dedicated wifi/BT, and GSM chips that I can just flick off of the board. I had an old Samsung Note 3 I tried modifying. I learned that simply removing the comms antennas does not disable any of the wireless features, it just attenuates them a bit. So then I removed the GSM chip and successfully disabled cellular, but removing the chip that handled wifi/BT (and apparently other stuff too) resulted in the device being unable to turn on. So I've been doing research trying to find a phone that can be modified in this way.

Let me know if you guys have any other ideas. Thanks

115
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/HarrisonGreen on 2024-01-21 15:30:13+00:00.

116
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/Savi321 on 2024-01-21 14:25:37+00:00.

117
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/francis105d1 on 2024-01-21 13:14:46+00:00.


The emerging landscape of decentralized finance (DeFi) introduces innovative protocols aiming to redefine stable asset tokens and interest-free loans. This article delves into a detailed comparison between Liquity, specifically Liquity V1, and a promising newcomer called mUSD. Both projects share a common goal of providing a stable asset token with an incentivized floating peg and facilitating interest-free loans through decentralized borrowing mechanisms.

The reasons why we shouldn't adopt a stablecoin for the CashToken ecosystem are beyond this article topic and we will still need to see the final product to conclude whether the Bitcoin Cash community should adopt the final product or not.

The stablecoin from CauldronSwap is inspired by Liquity V1 so the key points to observe are the following:

Collateral and Loans:

  • Users in both Liquity and mUSD lock up collateral (BCH in the case of mUSD) to generate collateralized tokens.
  • Liquidation can occur if the collateral value falls below a certain threshold (110% in the case of mUSD), with others having the opportunity to liquidate the contract and earn a premium.

Instantaneous Liquidation:

  • Liquity-like systems, including Liquity V1, implement "instantaneous liquidation" without relying on on-chain auctions, considered more capital-efficient than systems like MakerDAO.

Stability Mechanisms:

  • Liquity incorporates additional stabilization mechanisms, such as the stability pool, which is not explicitly mentioned in the mUSD discussion.

Borrowing and Redemption Fees:

  • Both Liquity and mUSD impose one-time borrowing and redemption fees, algorithmically adjusting based on factors like the last redemption time in Liquity.

Under-Collateralization Risk:

  • An unaddressed issue for mUSD is the risk of under-collateralization in the event of a more than 10% price crash between Oracle messages.

Weight and UpdateSequence:

  • mUSD considers implementing a weight mechanism in the commitment of the loan contract, adjusting based on redemptions and "updateSequence" calls.

NFT and Loan Ownership:

  • Discussion surrounds the possibility of making the NFT representing the loan transferrable, potentially enabling traceability in specialized contracts.

Market-based vs Algorithmic Corrections:

  • Consideration of whether corrections for supply/demand should be fully market-based or algorithmic.

Global Controlling Variables:

  • Discussion about whether controlling variables in the UTXO model should be simply single-threaded or require joint execution. Also, considerations regarding tracking an asset as closely as possible to reflect natural demand in the community.

Minimum Viable Product vs Innovation:

  • Reflection on the strategic choice between creating a minimum viable product, closely emulating an existing model or striving to pioneer the best possible solution.

Conclusion:

While mUSD draws inspiration from Liquity, this comparison highlights nuanced differences in their proposed implementations. As the projects evolve, further insights may emerge, shaping the trajectory of decentralized stable asset protocols. For specific inquiries or deeper exploration, feel free to inquire about this project and I would even add to follow the developers for future updates.

Find the original post at:

118
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/flowers_at_dusk on 2024-01-21 13:10:29+00:00.

119
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/Blocks_and_Chains on 2024-01-21 12:59:06+00:00.

120
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/Volgrand on 2024-01-21 11:54:15+00:00.


Hey there.

I have notice that during this bull run, the conversations about crypto have changed a lot.

For once, I have noticed an increase in scam emails and the sorts: "KYC for your wallet", "update your credentials on finance", "your funds are at risk"... I feel like the way they are trying to scam people has become a lot more obvious and spread than before.

On the other hand, I'm seeing a lot more of crypto users that are saying truths I myself said many times and got criticized for it: that most cryptos are a sum zero equation, that many alt coins are rug pull schemes or pyramid schemes, and a long etc.

I just find it quite interesting and wonder if the crypto investment is now moving to a new direction

121
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/FitScore3115 on 2024-01-21 11:18:49+00:00.

122
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/bIackrain on 2024-01-21 10:10:41+00:00.

123
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/kirtash93 on 2024-01-21 10:01:11+00:00.

124
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/GoodNature33 on 2024-01-21 09:18:44+00:00.


Polygon (actually an own PoS chain), Arbitrum and Optimism were the first "L2s", then Coinbase's BASE, now Metamask also get its L2 called Linea, then there's Scroll and zkSync. Manta has its new released L2.

This list seems not to end, there will be more and more L2s coming.

It feels like 2024 hype is all about new L2s.

But does the market get oversaturated soon? Will there be a L2 to rule them all or will most L2s co-exist parallel with each other?

The bridging from ETH to a L2 is a hassle already, it will be a greater hassle if people own ETH on a dozen of L2s.

Just my opinion, but I think that just two or three L2s will make it longterm depending on scalability, transaction costs, security and most importantly: adoption!

At the moment, I cannot see which L2 is better than the other.

125
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/travelerlifts07 on 2024-01-21 06:04:05+00:00.


Please find below a link to the following document related to the bankruptcy proceedings of PGX Holdings, Inc., et al., Case No. 23-10718 (United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware): • Notice of Hearing to Consider (I) the Adequacy of the Disclosure Statement and (I) Confirmation of the First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan Filed by the Debtors [Docket No. 483] For more information, contact [email protected] or call (888) 249-2721 (U.S./Canada) or (310) 751-2604 (International). Please visit the case website at or for copies of all court filings and other documents related to the Chapter 11 process. Do not reply to this e-mail, as it was delivered from an unmonitored e-mail account.

view more: ‹ prev next ›