this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
1004 points (98.8% liked)

World News

41834 readers
4179 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The White House has directed the State and Treasury Departments to draft a proposal for lifting some U.S. sanctions on Russia as part of Trump’s effort to restore ties and end the Ukraine war.

The proposal could ease restrictions on select Russian entities and oligarchs, though it’s unclear what the U.S. would receive in return.

Trump has signaled openness to sanctions relief despite previously threatening harsher measures.

Talks between U.S. and Russian officials have intensified, with economic cooperation, including rare earth minerals, emerging as a key topic.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Less than a third of eligible voters voted for Trump.

[–] 60d 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

"In reality, there is no such thing as not voting: you either vote by voting, or you vote by staying home and tacitly doubling the value of some Diehard's vote."

~ David Foster Wallace

70% of Murca voted for him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

So you're saying those who didn't vote love him? How does that make sense?

[–] 60d 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm saying they voted tacitly in agreement with everyone that voted for him. Whether they love the man doesn't matter. They supported him by voting with their asses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I was originally replying to the post above that said: "50% of the country loves their strongman president more than freedom or common sense." And I was specifically disputing the 50% figure in regards to "loving" Trump. So you're arguing something else entirely.

It's an important distinction because falsely claiming that half the country loves Trump legitimizes his authoritarian rule.

[–] 60d 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I understand what you're saying. I also dispute the 50% number.

I'm saying only 30% of the country voted for him, 30% against, and 40% voted with their asses, making the effective amount of "love" 70%, not 50%.

Approval rating of ~50% notwithstanding, he has a 70% mandate to fuck shit up when we have 40% ass-voters.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I disagree. There's no "mandate" when so many voters are so disaffected with politics that they'd rather stay home than express themselves at the polls.

[–] 60d 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I understand and respect your disagreement.

I view it as a trolley problem: if you don't flip the switch, or you love Krasnov, 3 people die. If you do, 1 person dies.

The ones who do nothing and do not flip the switch are in agreement with the Krasnov lovers since there is no "conscientious objector" button at the polls.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

Maybe from a game theory / trolley problem perspective, sure. But I guess my point is that a "presidential approval rating," as in the current support for the president, is not one to one with how the electorate voted (or didn't vote) four months ago. Especially as we get further from that event over time.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Less than less than a third voted against him.