this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
1373 points (99.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

7611 readers
2076 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When did compound interest even get invented?

[–] Sturgist 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Compound interest when charged by lenders

Today “compound interest” usually relates to reinvested dividends and amortized growth/appreciation of investments (e.g., stocks, bonds) simply because non-predatory loans are designed for payoff within some fixed term. So if the term “compound interest” applies, something unexpected is happening (e.g., default) and the loan will be bundled and sold at a discount to collections.

Not far enough back to make a difference I’d wager

I’ll take that wager! 5k daily, ignoring inflation and leap-years, compounding annually (not quarterly) at 10% annualized ROI, gives us the standard annuity formula

1.1 * 5000 * 365 (1.1^n^-1) / 0.1

where n is the number of years, which

… in 100 years becomes ~278 billion (e11)

… in 200 years becomes ~3.8 million billion (e15)

… in 300 years becomes ~53 billion billion (e19)

… in 400 years becomes ~721 thousand billion billion (e23)

… in 533 years becomes ~231 billion billion billion (e29)

If that sounds incredible to you, you’re not alone. It’s the result of a hyperbolic growth curve that starts slow but keeps accelerating indefinitely, and 533 years is a very long time in market terms, so you easily reach the silly-numbers range.

Edit: the numbers before were napkin computation. I edited this to use the standard annuity formula which should be more accurate. Point should be the same though. Exponential growth is crazy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

100% agree with the point you're making and 100% disagree with the math that you did to get there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Lol you’re right! It looks like the final number I gave was only for 400 years. I didn’t actually reach 533.

Also I was rounding numbers midway through like a pen and paper physics computation. Since that error scales exponentially, even if I had gotten to 533 the final number was guaranteed to be off.

Update: fixed it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

even $1 at 1% compound interest gets ridiculous after a hundred years

[–] Sturgist 4 points 2 days ago

DAMN YOU AND YOUR MONSTER MATHS!