this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
1420 points (99.2% liked)
Microblog Memes
8034 readers
4581 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Can liability waivers bring someone back to life?
They don't ask you for a document that your cardiologist let you fly. They don't ask you for a document that you don't need a document from any other doctor. They only ask a woman that. Because it's not about health.
If someone dies of heart attack on plane, nothing happens, they just die. If someone goes to labor, they bring the plane down.
they absolutely bring the plane down. most declared Maydays are for medical emergencies in flight. until someone's pronounced dead by an authority, they are a critically ill passenger.
How are you supposed to see if someone has a heart condition?
I'm asking since you made a statement making them equal. Can you see if someone is pregnant at 20+ weeks? The answer is yes, therefore you can enforce it.
However, enforcing it like they appeared to have done and asking irrelevant questions are the real issues.
Why the fuck does this matter? Are we only care about health if it's visible?
Oh, so it is ok to check for pregnant women then? Good. Then thats sorted.
That's an impressive way to not comprehend a written text. Not the dumbest maybe, but up there.
I was simply responding in a similarily stupid non-answer kind of way that you did.
Obviously you should care about peoples health and asking like that is so missing the point that the only response is to be as asenine.
The point is that you can't look at someone and see if they have a heart issue, so you aren't gonna be able to enforce the rule. But you might just maybe be able to spot a 28 weeks pregnant lady.
No, but if a pregnant mother wants to get on the plane despite knowing the risks, then a liability waiver should let them
Can you sign a liability waiver for killing a child that has gone past the time for a legal abortion? Clearly there is a point when you put your child at risk. The liability waiver is for the airline.
If it's for the airline's liability then wouldn't it no longer be their business once passed to the consumer?
So murder is ok, as long as you get it signed off?
since when has that not been the case?
Try it if you want
what do you think this even means?
I’m not a company nor a state entity, no power is going to sign for me.
Why do you think others can then?
Well it's not the airline's responsibility if it's not their responsibility is my point. If it's her responsibility to inform them how along she is, then it's her who is responsible. If it's murder it's her doing it. 2 I mean as long as it checks all the proper boxes they'll do it to any of us, they just call it an execution. Even if they are able to prove the box was checked wrongly later. 3 people sign off on danger for their kids all the time. Is elevated danger murder? Is airline travel so dangerous it's guaranteed to kill the kid? Plenty of lines here that shouldn't get a "So mUrDEr iS oK?" Reaction.
I think the disagreement here comes down to whether you think life begins at conception, birth, or somewhere in between.
There is no disagreement. At 28 weeks there is 0 disagreement of the capability of bringing a child to term. Unless you're dying as the mom/birther, there is no way you get to perform an abortion after 28 weeks in any country.
Absolutely.