this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
216 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

71223 readers
4259 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The only thing I can tell is that they were already saving the chats of personal accounts but their SLAs prevent them from doing so with some corporate accounts. Apparently there is some concern that proprietary information will now be made part of a public case. Personally I feel like that’s the price of being an early adopter of something most people said was a bad idea but what do I know?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean ChatGPT will straight insist this won’t happen. So no, it’s not the price of being an early adapter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

If you are taking business advice from ChatGPT that includes purchasing a ChatGPT subscription or can’t be bothered to look up how it works beforehand then your business is probably going to fail.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, if classified information from government agencies comes to light in this case, there will be problems. Also important companies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If that happened wouldn't the Judge just dismiss/banhammer the evidence from the case somehow? (IDK IANAL)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

The judge can declare certain evidence to be confidential, not to be part of public record, for attorney's eyes only. But with high level security clearances, the judge may not even be able to see it. So who knows!