this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
298 points (93.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

10136 readers
2 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Showroom7561 52 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I believe it 100%.

I started riding with a Garmin bike radar and installed an app that tells me exactly how fast a car is going when it passes, and the majority are over the speed limit.

Just the other day, in a 60 km/h zone, I clocked two cars going 125 km/h.

If I thought for a second that police would charge these drivers using photo/video evidence, I'd fork over the $500 to get the radar with a camera built-in and report each and every speeding driver that passes me.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 years ago (101 children)

In Denmark we have the lovely new law that if you drive more than 100% over the speed limit and over 100 kmh or drive over 200 kmh at all or drunk driving with over 2‰ they confiscate the car and you are not getting it back at all. They confiscate the car regadles of who owns the car (with very few exceptions) and that is also if it is leased. So far since when the law started they have confiscated over 2000 cars in two years. It's my favourite law of all laws right now. The fine for driving crazy is also nicely proportional to your income and it removes the car so the person cannot just drive without license afterwards.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (19 children)

I can't get behind property seizure without compensation, but I can understand everything else.

Even if they said "you can't have this car any more, but can sell it from our facility" that'd be better I think

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In effect, is it really that different to a fine? It seems to have a couple of advantages, though: it's easier to collect, and it's proportional, so a person who can afford a fancy luxury car pays more than someone in an old banger, without the complexity of having to evaluate their income and savings.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is exactly the reason they are doing it. Proportional to income and the car is completely and physically removed from the road. There was a big issue here where the offender would just drive without license or the car was leased or borrowed so there was no real penalty. Now the leasing company would have to take responsibility for leasing fancy supercars to anyone and everyone and people lending their car to a known drunk or fast driver would definitely think twice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (14 children)

@TDCN

That part is all good. The problem is they don't care whose car it is. If I was to borrow your car, and then break this law, then YOU are out a car. Yes, you can try and get the money back from me, but that might take a decade if I don't have money to replace your car.
If you ask me, that's crazy.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Normally me neither, bit in this context where you are driving so recklessly you are endangering everyone else and we are talking over double the speed limit I'll allow it. Noone has any rights left when you are doing that kind of stuff deliberately.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

As long as it then goes swiftly through the court system to confirm this. Otherwise it is theft, like US asset forfeiture.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

@GBU_28 @TDCN In Australia we have a law that lets the police make you watch while they crush your car.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@GBU_28 play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Driving a car is not a right. Especially in Denmark where public transport is an perfectly viable alternative for most of the population.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)

Totally agree, which I said in my comment.

But owning property is owning it outright. You don't own it at the whim of someone else.

I in general do not agree with government seizure of property without compensation.

I agree with losing your license, losing the privilege to drive and use public roads, etc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@GBU_28
I've found that people are big fans of government action against people with little or no due process, until it happens to them.
@JegVilleSeShitposts

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don't know if you're aligned with me or not

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

@TDCN @Showroom7561 In my hometown its kind of a hobby to rent fancy sports cars for the weekend and this is as stupid as it sounds. I would love this law for Germany as well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@TDCN @Showroom7561 I'll be honest I think it's an an odd stance to take to say confiscation is wrong. The 100 kmh limit is about 60 mph, to be over 100% that means the limit is 30 mph. This limit is normally through a town, village or urban area. So if someone drives at 60 mph down the high street, that's not just a "little bit of speeding", that's completely reckless

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

@TDCN @Showroom7561 Impossible in Germany 😄 But it sounds very good - and easy to understand

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

@TDCN

You should promote this lovely law to our German government. Our #Autobahn would be empty within short time. 😂

#GermanAutobahn
#idiots

@Showroom7561 @briankrebs

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

@TDCN @Showroom7561 Sounds like a good idea indeed. Only one remark: what if the car is shared by 2 persons?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

@alternative_be @TDCN @Showroom7561 then it's gone for both, I guess, as it's even confiscated from car sharing companies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

It's still confiscate. The law is pretty clear that it pretty much doesn't matter who owns the car.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

@TDCN @Showroom7561 unfortunately, police in the US have a great deal of leeway in how and when they enforce laws like this. I’m sure some wealthy individuals would get punished, but as is often the case over here, non-whites would probably be disproportionately represented as they already are with civil forfeitures. Conversely, I am all for the drivers of White BMW/AUDI SUVs having their cars seized and crushed, you know who you are.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

@TDCN @Showroom7561 do you have breathalyzer tests that actually work in normal use here? because if not this is just stealing cars, lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (5 children)

@TDCN @Showroom7561 onfeel they should drop the driving to 50% over the speed limit ... Very generous with 100%

Hugz & xXx

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@TDCN @Showroom7561 I assume they keep the car, so they get to steal innocent people's cars (belonging to people who committed no crimes) and keep them for profit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

@immibis @TDCN @Showroom7561 I rather suspect there are ways for the owner to petition it’s return, or get damages from the perpetrator

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@TDCN @Showroom7561 I think you mean blood/alcohol level of .2% - at 2% you would be long dead. And .2% is not driving drunk, that’s driving practically passed out. To be that drunk a 50kg dude would need to have 7 drinks in an hour. That person needs detox, not a car.

https://www.healthline.com/health/alcohol/blood-alcohol-level-chart

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

@Z_Zed_Zed @TDCN @Showroom7561 2‰ = 0.2%. The per-thousand sign isn't used often in informal English, but if someone took the effort to select the character, they probably meant it. 🙂

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

@deFractal @TDCN @Showroom7561 good call. Totally missed it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (10 children)

@TDCN @Showroom7561 The law seems inspired by the Swiss. They have had proportional fines for long (e.g. I recall the wealthy Finn racing in CH in his sports car and had to pay a fortune). Car removal is probably common in CH as well.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (8 children)

@TDCN @Showroom7561 What would happen to Carsharing Organisations? Forcing them to drop these customers would be fine but confiscating their cars would be a very bad idea IMO.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

@TDCN
To seize the property of someone who isn't the perpetrator goes against my sense of right and wrong and is normally a signpost of fascist governments.
@Showroom7561

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

@TDCN @Showroom7561 wow this is incredible! Now definitely this becomes one of my favourite laws too, while admittedly I never considered I could have any such favourite list.

load more comments (81 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You got a radar to check the speed of cars passing you?

[–] Showroom7561 1 points 2 years ago

The radar tells me when cars are approaching from behind and how far. It's been a massive gamechanger for safety by enhancing my spacial awareness.

There's an app for my bike computer that also captures speed and car counts using the radar.

I would imagine that aggregating this data from thousands of users could help cities to plan better cycling infrastructure and build traffic speed/flow mechanisms to enhance cyclist safety.

load more comments (5 replies)