this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
238 points (99.6% liked)

196

17034 readers
857 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (20 children)

This must create a dangerous intersection.

So am I to understand nobody here understands how this works? You yield when the arrow isn't lit. If the arrow is green, you don't have to yield.

[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded 5 points 1 year ago (15 children)

I personally find this confusing. The sign reads “Left turn yield on green”, which implies that you yield when the arrow is lit. A sign that says “right lane stop on red” means stop when the light is red, not when it isn’t.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (14 children)

You're ignoring the giant green circle on the sign, which means you yield on green solid, not green arrow. Green arrows give you right of way. If you're in the US and drive, please learn the road signs

[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not arguing about what the actual traffic laws are. I am arguing that this is objectively confusing design. "Left turn yield on green (CIRCLE)" does not mean that left turn yields on green. It means, "when turning left, but the solid light is green, and the left turn arrow is not lit up, yield to oncoming traffic. But if the solid light is green and the left turn arrow is lit, then do not yield." So you literally do not yield on green.

Sure you can just tell people to "please learn the road signs" no matter how terrible... or we can acknowledge that this is an asinine design. I have no idea why anyone would spend energy defending this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I interpret the sign correctly and would still strongly argue that it is a bad sign. I appreciate what you have added to the conversation!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Its a bad sign. I agree.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The thing is, you're not putting a dissertation on one of these signs. You're already supposed to yield on a solid green if you're turning left without a green arrow, that's already the law. This sign is a reminder for the stupid people about something they're already supposed to do, not allow someone who's never driven in their life to learn the laws as they go.

[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Left turn yield until (left arrow)”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So if it's red you can turn but just have to yield?

[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded 1 points 1 year ago

No, red means stop.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But if the solid light is green and the left turn arrow is lit, then do not yield

If I remember correctly, both lights would never be lit at the same time. It's either a green circle (yield) or a green arrow (right of way) just like literally every other intersection in existence ever.

[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are you taking about? Plenty of intersections are green on left turn and straight at the same time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Those are in different light boxes. This is 1 light box. The green and arrow won't be lit up at the same time in the same light box

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)