Jolteon

Nope, if you got more info on it it wouldn't be confusing anymore.

The problem with those virtual lamps is that when you look away, the light turns off but the heat doesn't.

Exactly. The hose to refill them from a propane tank isn't that expensive, and it will save you loads of money in the long run if you go through those small tanks at any reasonable pace.

Have you tried properly mounting the network drive? Another option would be to just install audiobookshelf on the NAS.

They're the people who just haul their own trash to the dump.

Wow, it's a non-political meme!

The the problem with wind is that it's fairly unreliable (you don't know when you'll get power), as well as being relatively high maintenance (though not compared to coal).

Is there even a place on the website that asks for that information?

Technically yes, but practically no for the first question. Properly stored nuclear waste has very minimal radiation leakage.

As for the second, it's complicated. The actual amount of radioactive waste is less than 10,000 cubic meters. There's quite a bit more than that of just water that has become toxic due to radiation, but the storage requirements of that are much lower. Here's a rough infographic: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/visualizing-all-the-nuclear-waste-in-the-world/

Also, while The low level waste would still fit in a single square mile if you were restricted to that, using natural caves is a lot cheaper and easier than building tanks, so it's not exactly a realistic solution.

Breathing is the no risk, no effort, (relatively) low reward option. The only time you'll stop making money is if you're dead, and you're still making 350,000 a year.

All nuclear waste ever produced could be safely stored in less than a square mile (Plus a radius around that to prevent idiots tampering with it). The safety issues of it are greatly over exaggerated most of the time. The problem with that, is that storing nuclear waste safely is relatively (though not extremely) expensive.

It would also be interesting to see this kind of list for all the other Presidents we've had throughout our history. While I doubt many of them would compare, it would be useful as a point of comparison and historical record.