PlzGivHugs

Two companies of tens or hundreds of thousands. And for those two, how much money did they make off the backs of illegal workers? I'm willing to bet significantly more than they were fined.

Edit: at least for Durable Inc, according to Ice, who is is probably going to want to appear tough rather than dow playing it, this is the second time they've been fined and their workforce is 92% illegal workers (roughly 53 legal workers, 604 not). If they're not bankrupted by having, 92% illegal workers, clearly its just a tax, not a punishment or attempt to stop them.

Might be worth putting in some information about the mechanics of knockback, and tactics around it. Back when I played bedwars and skywars semi-competitvely, this was a factor that even skilled players often failed to take into consideration. Esspecially in gamemodes that were played over "the void" it was often an easy way to eliminate otherwise skilled players.

Edit: some of the basics are already integrated, but its probably worth adding a bit more detail, or seperating some of it from hit selection.

From my understanding, its an Atlantic accent, although one that has mostly disappeared over the last few decades.

It wasn't a shadow drop, but it was relatively light on PR. They had one big trailer six months before launch some gameplay videos, and of course the store page available.

Here is the article this article is using for its source: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/19/world/europe/russia-finland-border.html

Edit: Yes, the article isn't great, and clearly has a Russian bias. I was just linking it becuase its the original, and more complete source.

At least from my layman's understanding, (I am not a lawer):

If you have legal access to the work being used for training, and no other terms in licencing restrict its use, using it for training is currently not inherently considered copyright infringement. That said, if your copy is used to refrence or recreate the character being copied, it would infringe on the copyright for the character. So legally, from my unprofessional understanding, you can make an AI voice clone, as long you don't try to replicate the character with it. This may be further regulated in some regions, but to my knowledge, most don't have anything specific in law yet.

On the other hand, morally...

I think two main things need to happen: increased transparency from AI companies, and limits on use of training data.

In regards to transparency, a lot of current AI companies hide information about how their models are designed, produced, weighted and use. This causes, in my opinion, many of the worst effects of current AI. Lack of transparency around training methods mean we don't know how much power AI training uses. Lack of transparency in training data makes it easier for the companies to hide their piracy. Lack of transparency in weighting and use means that many of the big AI companies can abuse their position to push agendas, such as Elon Musk's manipulation of Grok, and the CCP's use of DeepSeek. Hell, if issues like these were more visible, its entirely possible AI companies wouldn't have as much investment, and thus power as they do now.

In terms of limits on training data, I think a lot of the backlash to it is over-exaggerated. AI basically takes sources and averages them. While there is little creativity, the work is derivative and bland, not a direct copy. That said, if the works used for training were pirated, as many were, there obviously needs to be action taken. Similarly, there needs to be some way for artists to protect or sell their work. From my understanding, they technically have the legal means to do so, but as it stands, enforcement is effectively impossible and non-existant.

Do you have a source for that graph? I'm interested in the study, but couldn't find it with a web search.

You underestimate how bad we can be at cooking. It takes me like an hour just to peal and chop up ingredients for even a simple dish like mashed potatoes or stir fry.

The general, tankie lack of respect for human life, genicide denialism, ect., as well as transphobia.

It does exist, but it's not common. My guess as to that its multifaceted. First and biggest is obviously sexism. Women are seen as weak and mean expected to take care of them. Anything other than this is taboo, and in more conservative areas, seen as wrong. The only reason it's at all accepted in kink is that its purely behind closed doors, so people get less chance to attack it. I also think that most women just enjoy the status quo. Whether this is because women like to be submissive, or just that people in general like to be submissive and women don't have to hide it is impossible to tell. Regardless, a lot of people are perfectly happy with the current expectations. Finally, I think its just momentum. It takes time for things to change.

If you do want to find more stuff like this, the main terms to look for are, "role reversal" for nuclear-family-esk relationships with reversed gender roles, "female led relationship" for generally more intense women in charge, or "gentle femdom" for more gentle and caring stuff, but more sex focused. As much as I hate to recommend it, Reddit is probably the best spot to look, seeing as there isn't really any other aggregators for something that niche and taboo.

Its not inherently a bad idea, but you need to keep in mind that is a crutch and not a cure. Substances won't solve your problems, and shouldn't be your sole, chosen treatment.

That said, just as crutches can help you survive and are often healthier overall than bedrest, so too can substances help. For example, if you have severe, chronic depression, and can't afford medication, while weed won't help (and may make it slightly worse overall), it might help you remain functional durring depressive episodes. Its no medication, but if its keeps you alive long enough to keep working towards a long-term solution, its worth it.