Fucking hell. I... really gave you too much credit, huh? "Who cares that the only films average people will see are AI trash?" Like, if you don't get the problem here, I really don't think I can explain it.
ThisSeriesIsFalse
joined 2 years ago
So you don't know how much people don't care.
Sure, they'll exist. Just like how parts for old rifles are technically still being made today. But most people will never see one, nor do they care to see one. Most people don't care about the quality of films, hence the success of a lot of the Marvel films despite rapid decreases in quality, or the Star Wars sequels. I shouldn't need to explain why most people only seeing the shitty AI slop films is a bad thing.
That's exactly how capitalism works. AI is cheaper than hiring people, and any company that doesn't take any and every opportunity to increase profits is failing at capitalism.
How dystopian, you mean. Companies will try to replace as many jobs as possible with AI, meaning everything gets considerably worse in quality and reliability, and there won't be any new jobs to replace the old ones, leading to drastic unemployment everywhere. The only ones they won't be able to replace are the jobs that actively destroy your body from doing them. Every mainstream social media will be flooded with shitty AIs pretending to be human, so people don't form any real connections and are easier to manipulate via tweaking their AI "friends" a bit. Any government that doesn't pass Anti-AI laws will find their bureaucracy jammed by a glut of AI generated proposals. Legal trials will become a sham as any evidence you need can just be generated, no need for the truth. Our current actors will be turned into AI versions, and then every movie created by that company forevermore will use only those AIs because it's cheaper. The education system is already being completely circumvented by people generating answers to their work, so they don't learn anything. Neither humans nor AIs are ready for how hard they're trying to shove this stuff into everything.
Probably the same ratio as unicorns to leprechauns.
"Well, WW2 is over, what'll become of the Allies now?"
The humble NATO:
Thefting...
Most people buying clothes aren't looking for high fashion, they're looking for something comfortable in a colour that they like. Those who are looking for fashion tend to get clothes that are originally designed and made by a tailor, and then copied so others may wear them, importantly with the consent of the tailor. These are akin to YCH commissions, since the artist/tailor gets paid for the design.
This doesn't apply to AI image generation, as the artists are almost never asked for their consent before their work gets copied and cloned a million times over. Nor do they get any sort of compensation for their stolen work.
And they did so via slavery. Still do in some parts of the world. So their argument is still valid. Clothing people requires these tools, art does not. AI 'art' doesn't need to exist.
Just give it a little squeegee on a robot arm to run down its panel every so often
view more: next ›
THE EYES