VerbFlow

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

"bUt iT's oNLy tHe dAnGeRoUs oNeS!"

I loathe law-and-order rhetoric in any nation, but most certainly in America. Tough On Crime policies have led to the dumbest fucking things that have ever existed in the United States. People are voting for a serial liar and conman who will probably ship them off to Dijbouti or El Salvador just to stay away from someone who broke the law once, or who is likely to break the law. The lesson we should all learn is to stop going nuts over "crime waves". If the news claims that crime is "going through the roof" or that there is an "epidemic of crime", make sure to remember:

  1. There are way, way bigger threats to public safety than a few gangbangers, for example tech companies, evangelicals, and Nazis.
  2. Criminals are people too. They have hopes and dreams, motives, economic conditions, and opinions. Consider why someone is committing a murder or robbery, rather than assuming it's because of greed.
  3. There are for-profit security forces and prisons that all benefit from fear of crime. The news will often blow crime out of proportion to satisfy their sponsors, and downplay authoritarianism likewise.
  4. Police officers are often just as dangerous as criminals. It's better to think of crime as a situation that can be escalated and de-escalated (cops are notoriously bad at this) than as the result of Bad People who need Good People to stop them.
  5. There are a lot of good resources for reading about crime in a productive way. Although I am not quite Anarchist, the Anarchist Library has a lot of thought-provoking material on what makes law just and unjust. There's a big difference between "murder is wrong because the Law says so" and "murder is wrong because killing people is wrong".
  6. Some people are so evil that they need to be killed, i.e. Real Estate CEOs.
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

How about guillotining them?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I want every unironic Capitalist to see this and reflect on their system. Is this "democracy"? Was this worth all the resources spent to conquer Communism? Was this worth the United States being the "world police"? Is Capitalism really worth defending?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

If you could just go outside and talk to some friends, that'd massively improve your situation. Just give small talk to somebody. Somebody real. They'll cheer you up. You could also find a homeless shelter to volunteer at.

I mean, I understand things are awful, with global warming and forced deportations, but this lachrymose screed isn't what life is like. There are countless people all over the world who are creative, kind, and full of hope, and we are merely beset by great problems.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I mean, Lemmy itself was created by Communists if I'm correct

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

then lobby your government

First of all, only 5% of people live in the United States. Saying "your government" as if it's the only one is bad practice. There are countless other governments out there. Secondly, I don't know if the U.S. Gov't can easily be lobbied by grassroots movements as opposed to local bundle-state governments. An example is Oregon, which is a very left-leaning state that has provided welfare to its citizens, even if the federal government can't.

microsoft is a corp, they’re only beholden to profit. even if they could give a shit about the poors they wouldn’t unless it could make pretty lines go up.

This is why you should find ways to oppose this:

  1. Vote and campaign in your bundle-state. Getting the entire federal government to do something is hard, but getting Pennsylvania, the holder of Three-Mile Island, to intervene and declare it illegal to build nuclear power plants there is easier, not just because you need less votes, but because most people who live in PA probably remember what happened there.
  2. Do sabotage. This will not just be the government going against Microsoft, but the people as well. You can block trucks from coming in, you can vandalize the property, break stuff, and steal things. People of all political positions have done this successfully.
  3. Boycott Microsoft, or do economic action against them. You know about something Microsoft doesn't like? Make it bigger. Get people on a Linux distro. Have people keep the computers they bought, and buy used computers so you don't give money to Microsoft. In xUbuntu there is a host of applications that effectively replace the Microsoft Office Suite, if you ever needed that.

i don’t mean to be a dick but this is poor rhetoric. “their nuclear power plant is selfish and bad bc i said so >:(“ really only serves to give libs canon fodder for the “personal responsibility^tm” gun.

All you need to do is show them how bad AI is and they'll understand why its a bad thing, and then show them the solutions. The rhetoric isn't just "they're hogging our energy", it's "AI is a really bad thing that clogs up the internet, and it could be used to fake evidence and make CSM, and the resources for its operation could be used for better ends." A big problem is that people think AI is unstoppable. It has nothing to do with the rhetoric of personal responsibility, and everything with AI looking like an unyielding miracle weapon. Showing how much AI takes to run strips it of its terror, and emboldens people to take action against it, since they know the devil is not as terrible as he is painted.

ik it seems like pedantry but this is a serious issue with leftist messaging in the modern world.

The real issue is that Leftists need to become more populist and aligned with the blue-collar working class of miners, farmers, and factory workers rather than the white-collar working class of filmmakers, game designers, and programmers. Many people assumed that blue-collar work would become obsolete, and I guess that due to the internet, more leftist ideas spread there than in the real world. The academization of Leftism is long and complicated, and has a lot to do with the growth of communication technology and the fall of the Berlin Wall, but I'd still argue that such academization is what made Leftism as impotent as it is. What needs to be done for Leftism is a "touching grass" of sorts, and a focus away from schools and universities and towards fields and factories. Leftism post-Biden should be modeled after the successes of Vladimir Lenin, Ho Chi Minh, and Mao Zedong, rather than the failures of Ralph Nader, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That sounds like something Heinlein would write during his earlier days. I completely agree with both the argument and reasoning, even tho he turned anti-Communist and insane before he wrote that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was always scared of becoming homeless when I was a kid. It motivates people to work hard: the beatings will continue until morale improves.

 

cross-posted from: https://pawb.social/post/24295950

Source (Bluesky)

 

It stands for "The (U)nited (S)oviet (S)ocialist (R)epublic (W)ill (R)ise (A)gain"

 

One is for Cascadian History, the other is anti-AI, which is dated now that AI is revealed to be a scam. I may need some more experience on Lemmy.

 

If you want to become a mod here, please tell me. I will look and see if you are worthy of modding briefly.

 

I haven't read these yet, but I will soon. This is in response to the United States using drones to enact ethnic cleansing. This was a breakneck search, but if anyone has a good in-depth article for countering drone warfare, please let me know.

NATO.int | Countering Drones: Looking for the Silver Bullet

NDUPress.ndu.edu | Breaking the Shield: Countering Drone Defenses

Claws.in | Drone and Counter-Drone Warfare at a Tactical Level

A good idea would be for drone hobbyists to outfit theirs with weapons. It's incredibly important, too, to target factories, and develop chemicals, EMPs, and other technologies that can disrupt drone functioning (drones are quite fragile). Hopefully China, or otherwise industralized states, developing drones en masse can send some to resistance groups.

 

I'm trying to post any comments, but it endlessly loads. I'll check my internet connection

 

There's also the Oregon Encyclopedia if you're interested in the region as a whole.

3
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I was just thinking about it after looking it up. What has it, in world affairs, actually done? What changes did it make to society that were worth making?

EDIT: I wanted to ask this because I had some thoughts on Critical Theory that I wasn't sure of. I thought it was just empty talk that would be repeated and repeated but never acted upon. Like, what would our world look like without Critical Theory being developed? How come such a "great ideology" couldn't actually stop the War of Terror, or the election of Donald Trump, or wealthy corporate executives becoming obscenely rich, or the Housing Crisis and Great Recession, or the Rwandan Genocide, or Russia's invasion of Ukraine, or anything? What does it do to actually help people?

 

I wanted to show all these indie sites so that you guys could explore. These have really good ideas and aren't hindered by concision.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

 

This is a really good read. If you have any crits let me know.

 

Sometimes, I'd scroll Reddit because something would link there, but in the case of making a new account, I can't post anything, even comments because there's a minimum karma limit on almost every sub.

The deal is that Lemmy doesn't have the number of users that Reddit has. I suppose I'll make new communities. That'll help.

 

What should we do after Harris/Walz is elected? I was wondering if you had some ideas. Here are mine:

  • Mass strikes in the workplace, demands being taxes for the rich and higher wages
  • Mass strikes in the military, demands being to end support for Israel, take away excessive military bases, shut down Gitmo, drastically reduce the budget, &c
  • Get as many people off the internet as possible
  • Get people arms and arms training so they can defend themselves without police, and heavily reduce police funding
  • Refuse to pay any landlords, lead attacks on real estate offices

Maybe some stuff would be extreme, but I ask you please to separate the wheat from the chaff, along with adding your own material. I may not be that smart, but at least I'm preparing.

(If you want to remember to vote, set yourself a timer like everyone else with memory issues. It should go ding on the day you get your ballot!)

I also feel kinda hazy

view more: next ›