balderdash9

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Where the hell are the clothes folding robots??

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

I'm hoping someone who has read more theory can answer this question. Because I don't see why religious affiliation should conflict with class solidarity and the abolition of private property.

[–] [email protected] 136 points 3 days ago (4 children)

It's /b, the whole thing is probably made up

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 week ago

I'd put that shit on my wall like Mr. Krab's first dollar

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

just float them on a barge out at sea

I hope I can pass that test.

I hope this is hyperbole.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

But what are the numbers behind those percentages? Did Trump just throw more at the wall to see what would stick?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

By the time people realized democracy is gone it will be too late.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Congress denied Obama's SCOTUS pick, Trump rushed through several judges, and now Trump's signing executive orders prompting the SCOTUS to reinterpret the Constitution. Even if you agree with Trump this sets an incredibly bad precedent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
  • Step 1: Reinterpret the 14th Amendment so tens of thousands of immigrants lose their citizenship
  • Step 2: Mass deportation
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago
  • Step 1: Reinterpret the 14th Amendment so hundreds of thousands of immigrants lose their citizenship
  • Step 2: Mass deportation
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
  • Step 1: Reinterpret the 14th Amendment so hundreds of thousands of immigrants lose their citizenship
  • Step 2: Mass deportation
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Oh how I wish that were true

 
24
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

The vast majority of people reading this right now subscribe to Presentism. Presentism is the view that only the present time exists and so only present objects exist. Every moment, as time passes, objects that come to be in the present come to exist and objects that fall out of the present cease to exist. The past and future, as well as past and future entities, exist no more than fictional characters or the objects in dreams.

One problem with presentism is it becomes difficult to make sense of assertions about other times. How can I make sense of the claim that, "Socrates was taller than Descartes" if neither person exists? How can I make sense of the claim that, "The sun will come out tomorrow" when there is no tomorrow? We might be tempted to say that claims about non-existent entities are meaningless in that they do not have a truth-value. But to say these claims are meaningless seems to go against our intuitions about our own speech acts.

Another objection comes from physics. According to special relativity, simultaneity between objects or events depends on the frame of reference that you use to view them. Events happening at the same time from one perspective will be happening at a different time from a different perspective. The popular example is that the people riding in the ambulance hear the sirens earlier than the people standing on the sidewalk. Special relativity tells us no frame of reference is privileged. Therefore, there is no fact of the matter as to whether two events are happening at the same time. This seems to imply that there is no fact of the matter about what counts as the present.

In response, we could adopt a different ontology of time. The Growing Block Theory argues that the past and present exist. More precisely, it argues that, as the present moves forward, the past and past objects continue to exist (and the future does not exist). So every past instance of you exists just as much as you do in the present. You are "spread out" in time, so to speak.

Another popular theory in the metaphysics of time is Eternalism. This theory says the past, present, and future all co-exist equally. Hence, past, present, and future objects, events, and relations all exist. On this view time never passes; we live in a frozen universe. Differences in time are only perspectival (like how people seem smaller when you look at them from far away). Eternalists do, however, admit that events are structured by temporal relations such as "before" and "after".

There are other theories (such as rejecting the existence of time entirely) but this is enough for our purposes. Given these considerations, what is your metaphysics of time?

 
 

Basically the title. The fact that we can read an encyclopedia entry on the economic history of the Netherlands from our phone is crazy. Scrolling over to a random island in the middle of the Atlantic to experience a virtual street tour is insane. There are even websites that let you see live security camera footage (shoutout to EarthCamTV). We have so much information that we take for granted.

 
 

Maybe we should copy the French. They seem to have the right idea.

661
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Another reason to like Tim Walz. He has openly supported RCV: https://www.rcvbloomington.org/supporters

 
 
 
 
 
view more: next ›