Anarchism

1814 readers
6 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.


Other anarchist comms


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
176
177
178
179
180
 
 

Typical greek "evidence" against anarchists. They've been doing the same for years now

181
182
183
184
 
 

An evergreen post of mine from 13 year ago (damn)

185
186
55
Our blessed comrades (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 

Y'all inspire me

187
16
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 

In case people were wondering what this has to do with anarchism, I felt this raises some salient points. For example

(As futurist and SF author Karl Schroeder remarks, every technology has political implications. If you have automobiles you will inevitably find out that you need speed limits, drunk driving laws, vehicle and driver licensing to ensure the cars and their drivers are safe ... and then jaywalking laws, the systematic segregation of pedestrians and non-automotive traffic from formerly public spaces, air pollution, and an ongoing level of deaths and injuries comparable to a small war. You also get diversion of infrastructure spending from railways to road building, and effective limits on civil participation by non-drivers.

188
 
 

Funny aside, ziq hates me :D

189
190
 
 
191
192
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/8181688

undefined

193
194
10
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 

I was thinking of valid implementations of anarchism in society. Anarchists do not believe in the power and authority in institutions, although we must respect that they do command a degree of power. We believe that the gun can kill, however we don't believe that the gun is holy.

It's a straightforward consequence that anarchism does not need any revolution, does not need any overthrow of power, for anarchism to thrive! Why would we overthrow a government and an economic system whose intrinsic value we reject anyway? An atheist does not need to fight to overthrow the “theist”, the religious establishment; in the same way anarchy does not need to overthrow the “arch”. We just have to work around it, undermine it and even supplement it generation by generation, until it's something actually good for society. We recognize that the government and the economy is a benign growth, a force not to be reckoned with but a force that we must work around. We recognize that the hands of the economy and the government is not omnipotent and omniscient. There is a limit of this force, and that's where anarchy lives. Beyond the power of government and economy, but within the reach of our collective powers.

Anarchy is now. We act not in opposition to the economy and to the government, but independent of the economy and the government. I say an "overlay network" mainly because I'm inspired by the work of people who developed the i2p project, an overlay network for the internet meant for protecting anonymity and privacy. They take the already existing infrastructure of the internet, one that does not value privacy and anonymity at all, and even profits from people's intimate data, and makes something private and secure on top of that. (it's also a good place to torrent stuff, check it out)

So, that's what I think anarchy should be. An overlay network for the government and the economy. Something that takes the already built infrastructure of the government, and the already existing powers of the economy, and shapes it into freedom and equality for all.

We have no president, because all of us are the president. We do not kill because we have no need for violence to exact change. We rely on our collective powers, and we do not worship a centralized authority.

My thoughts for this were inspired by this YouTube video: How Companies Plan The Economy. About 20 minutes in he talks about Chile's proposed government arount 1971 and 1973 called "Cybersyn." Here's an excerpt from Wikipedia:

"Project Cybersyn was a Chilean project from 1971 to 1973 during the presidency of Salvador Allende aimed at constructing a distributed decision support system to aid in the management of the national economy. The project consisted of four modules: an economic simulator, custom software to check factory performance, an operations room, and a national network of telex machines that were linked to one mainframe computer"

This is meant not to be a manifesto but as tinder for a more productive discussion in how we can actually bring about anarchism in today's global world. The distributed power that the internet gives us is ripe for us to create this "distributed decision support system."

What it do baby

195
196
197
198
199
200
view more: ‹ prev next ›