Anarchism

4010 readers
78 users here now

Are you an Anarchist? The answer might surprise you!

Rules:

  1. Be respectful
  2. Don't be a nazi
  3. Argue about the point and not the person
  4. This is not the place to debate the merits of anarchism itself. While discussion is encouraged, getting in your “epic dunks on the anarkiddies” is not. As a result of the instance’s poor moderation policies and hostility toward anarchists by default, lemmygrad users are encouraged not to post here, though not explicitly disallowed if they aren’t just looking to start a fight.

See also:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
51
52
53
 
 

cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/6031144

While it would be easy to dismiss this as CrimethInc [hereforth the Outlet] cautiously mitigating any potential liability if self-immolation generalizes, the rejection of the framework of martyrdom demands attention. The question is not whether Aaron qualifies as a shahid within the Palestinian context, although demonstrators in Yemen have proclaimed Aaron a “martyr of humanity” and an argument can be made for him having become an anarchist martyr in the lineage of Louis Lingg, Avalon, and Mikhail Vasilievich Zhlobitsky. The bigger issue: the Outlet’s assertion that an individual’s death, particularly in the context of the US, is the “worst of all possible certainties” reveals a deep disconnect with the context of this entire decolonial struggle. In the days following October 7th, anti-colonial anarchist thinkers such as Zoé Samudzi argued that the figure of the martyr marked a fundamental contradiction for the secular left’s ability to fully comprehend and act in solidarity with the Palestinian resistance. The martyrs constitute a force in the present for all who live and continue to struggle. Aaron framed his self-immolation as “not that extreme” compared to the ascension to martyrdom of tens of thousands in Gaza. By implying that Aaron’s choice was too extreme, the Outlet dishonors the reality of the struggle within Palestine and undercuts the potential of Aaron’s sacrifice.

54
 
 

Based out of Canada and made with support from around the world. Check them out anarchistunionjournal.org/ And Sign up for your free copy of the upcoming issue. anarchistunionjournal.org/contact/

55
 
 

Collective Action Problems are Not a Capitalist Plot: On the Non-Triviality of Going from Individual to Collective Rationality

https://wedontagree.net/collective-action-problems-are-not-a-capitalist-plot

@anarchism

56
 
 

Pretty much the title. I find myself in discussions about ever degrading working and living conditions in the US (first and foremost) and some in germany (especially IT companies).

What just came to my mind:

If I were Microsoft, Google, Apple and Amazon (add billionaires and other billion dollar companies as you like) and wanted to make the most money possible, with my limited competence but unlimited greed and resources, I would pressure politicians to change policy for my benefit and against workers and consumers (check).

But some of the more mobile folks would move to other countries, endangering my and the cooperating country‘s income.

So, since I own the media as well, I spark fascist propaganda everywhere I can to keep people from voting with their feet.

Am I totally losing it or does this make sense?

P.S.: Sorry if this is the wrong place but I thought I‘d ask folks with diverse opinions that are open to discuss capitalist failures without shutting it down immediately.

57
58
 
 

By John Pring on 22nd February 2024

Listen

Disabled activists have announced a fightback against a series of “horrific” government social security reforms and have called for “active resistance” to the plans, starting with a national day of action and a protest in London early next month.

A meeting in parliament this week heard that disabled people could not wait for the general election, because there was no guarantee that a Labour government would reverse the government’s proposals.

Instead, they called for a return to street protest, led by Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC), to resist Conservative plans to cut out-of-work disability benefits and introduce other harmful social security reforms.

That resistance will begin with a day of action on 4 March, which will include a protest in central London two days before the spring budget.

Monday’s meeting was attended by leading disabled people’s organisations from across the UK, and senior figures from two major unions: PCS, which represents many frontline DWP workers, and Unite, which has close links with disabled activists.

Among DPAC’s concerns are government plans to intensify the conditions and sanctions imposed on benefit claimants, and to tighten the work capability assessment (WCA).

They also point to proposals that will eventually scrap the WCA, and rely instead on the personal independence payment (PIP) assessment.

This could see benefit cuts for hundreds of thousands of disabled people and new powers for unqualified work coaches to decide what work-related activity a disabled person should carry out.

DPAC also says that hundreds of thousands of disabled people could be at risk of having their benefits sanctioned by the government’s roll-out of so-called “in-work conditionality”*.

Ellen Clifford, of DPAC and the UK coalition of Deaf and disabled people’s organisations that monitors the implementation of the UN disability convention, said disabled people were now faced with “another set of horrific proposals in the pipeline” after 14 years of their lives becoming “harder and harder” under Conservative-led governments.

She said Labour had promised to work in co-production with disabled people on social security policy if it won power, but disabled people remembered that it was Labour that introduced the WCA “and find it difficult to trust where that co-production will go”.

She said: “The line seems to be that Labour needs to present itself as being tough on welfare reform in order to get elected.”

She added: “We simply can’t afford to wait until after an election and definitely not for a lengthy process of co-production to start fighting back against these horrific proposals.

“We can’t wait for anyone else to stop them.”

Paula Peters, a member of DPAC’s national steering group, told the meeting that “strong and principled leadership” was needed to oppose the “completely unacceptable” government reforms and to raise awareness among the public about why they were wrong, but “Labour clearly isn’t going to do that”.

She said: “We need to build a united campaign that speaks loudly to say that these changes are completely unacceptable, and we need to demand instead a social security system that is fair for all, one that provides a social safety net that affords a decent living, one that we can access without having our mental health destroyed, and one that doesn’t kill us.”

She said that was why DPAC has called the national day of action for 4 March, two days before the spring budget, which will include a protest in London, and – it is hoped – other protests organised by local groups around the country, while DPAC will also suggest ways that disabled activists can take part from home.

Andy Greene, a member of DPAC’s national steering group, who has played a crucial role in past DPAC direct action, told the meeting: “I think there is a real need just to get back on the streets… and make sure we’re a street presence again, because I think that is where our strength came from previously.

“I think that re-establishing that commitment to street politics is important for any campaign.”

John McDonnell, the Labour MP, DPAC member and former shadow chancellor, who hosted the meeting, said he believed the event was about the “relaunch of a resistance movement on disability” after years of “cuts, austerity, stigma, threats, and, to be frank, abuse”.

He said it was vital to “demonstrate we are back again” and that disabled people needed to “mobilise” and “ruthlessly pursue” their demands.

He said: “I just get angry about it, that we are back to where we were after all these years, and there are too many people suffering as a result of that.

“So, this time we can’t allow ourselves to fail.”

Megan Thomas, policy and research officer for Disability Wales, told the meeting that disabled people and their allies “must fight these announcements with all that we have”.

She said Disability Wales research on the cost-of-living crisis had found an “extremely flawed” social security system that was “humiliating, traumatising and incredibly complicated”.

And she said the government’s proposed changes would “do nothing to support people into work and do nothing to support people out of poverty”.

Douglas Bryce, deputy chief executive of Disability Equality Scotland, said it was still unclear how the UK government reforms would impact on Scotland, as the Scottish government has introduced its own version of personal independence payment.

But he said he needed to “robustly highlight the potential danger of suicide and increased hospitalisation, particularly of those with mental health issues” if the UK government’s proposals are brought in.

Michael Lorimer, from The Omnibus Partnership, a grassroots organisation of disabled people in Northern Ireland, said: “The new proposals are brutal and will unquestionably cause more poverty, deaths and suicides if they are not stopped.

“For this, we need to unite across the UK to build a strong resistance, so that whoever comes to power at the next general election knows that if they cut disability benefits and dare to try what the Tories are proposing, they will face serious, coordinated grassroots opposition.”

He said that Deaf and disabled campaigners in Northern Ireland were organising to set up a Northern Ireland branch of DPAC.

Svetlana Kotova, director of campaigns and justice at Inclusion London, said it was vital to find a way to communicate the financial distress disabled people were facing to the general public “who the Labour party probably thinks wants them to be tough on social security”.

She said: “I want to think that they don’t know the horrific situation we are in and wouldn’t support further cuts.”

She called for support from other organisations for the Disabled People’s Manifesto, which includes a call for a rights-based social security system, abolition of sanctions and a decent income for disabled people.

Marion Fellows, the SNP’s Westminster spokesperson on disability, the only MP apart from McDonnell to attend the meeting, said she had spoken frequently in parliament about the pledge made by Social Security Scotland – set up by the Scottish SNP government – to provide “dignity, fairness and respect”.

She said: “That’s what most people expect, and that’s what should be a right for disabled people.”

Ian Pope, acting vice-president of the PCS union, and its DWP vice-president, said his union represented members who “administer this awful benefits system”, with many of them also subject to that system as claimants.

He told the meeting of the dossier of evidence that was presented to DWP late last year and showed the depth of the department’s “staffing crisis”, with his members “going under at an alarming rate”.

He said: “These testimonies demonstrated that the staffing crisis at DWP is creating an epidemic of mental ill-health among staff and has failed to protect the most vulnerable citizens in society.”

He said DWP had been trying – and failing – to recruit 20,000 more staff.

He said: “Why could it be that people don’t want to come and work in the DWP?

“Could it be that 25,000 admin staff at the Department for Work and Pensions, and I’m one included, are currently earning less than the national living wage?

“It is an absolutely shocking state of affairs.”

He said that many of the 13,500 work coaches who joined DWP during the pandemic have left.

He added: “They told the department when they left, and they told the union when they left: ‘This isn’t what I signed up for. I thought I was joining the DWP to make a difference, to help the most vulnerable people in society, not to issue sanctions, not to issue conditionality, not to harass people into offices.’”

He also pointed to Social Security Scotland’s “dignity, fairness and respect” pledge, and said: “Imagine the Westminster DWP putting that on their website.

“That has to be something we aspire to, everybody in this room, we have to aspire to, our future Labour government have to aspire to that.”

Brett Sparkes, a regional officer for Unite, which represents both workers and benefit claimants who don’t have jobs, said his union was campaigning against in-work conditionality.

He said that this and other government proposals, including changes to the WCA, “will increase the conditionality demands on disabled people to take jobs that not only do not suit them but offer no route to progression” and will keep people “in a cycle of low pay and insecure work”.

*Under in-work conditionality, those universal credit claimants who already have a paid job must still meet DWP requirements to look for further part-time jobs, increased hours from their current employer, or higher-paid jobs, or face a possible sanction

Picture: A DPAC direct action protest

A note from the editor:

Please consider making a voluntary financial contribution to support the work of DNS and allow it to continue producing independent, carefully-researched news stories that focus on the lives and rights of disabled people and their user-led organisations.

Please do not contribute if you cannot afford to do so, and please note that DNS is not a charity. It is run and owned by disabled journalist John Pring and has been from its launch in April 2009.

Thank you for anything you can do to support the work of DNS…

Donate

59
 
 

#NoMoreBenefitDeaths
National Day of Action
Monday 4th March 2024

On 19th February 2024 at the Parliament Meeting in London, DPAC and the UK Coalition have announced a united disability resistance against the Tory Government’s proposed brutal and horrific social security reforms.

We are calling for active resistance across the UK to these brutal attacks on disabled people.

We are gravely concerned that the government plans to intensify conditions and benefit sanctions imposed on claimants and tighten the Work Capability Assessment (WCA)

This would see social security cuts for hundreds of thousands of disabled people and new powers for unqualified work coaches in Job Centres who will decide what work related activity should be carried out.

We have already seen the devastation caused by previous so-called welfare reform policies. They have failed on their own terms – the OBR confirmed more than once that they were an economic disaster. We now we also have a large body of evidence laying bare the human catastrophe these policies caused; including the 2020 report ‘Health Equity in England‘ commissioned by UCL, which states that almost 150, 000 people (the vast majority from deprived areas) died as a direct result of austerity and welfare reform policies.

Kicking the poor – particularly those in receipt of benefits – is still somehow viewed by party policy wonks on both sides as a vote winner. While the richest in our society have seen their wealth grow by more than 20% just since the pandemic.

It is important to stress that we cannot wait for a general election and a potential change of government. Labour have rejoined the attacks on claimants, saying recently that disabled people will not “languish on social security sickness support but will be pushed into work.”
This is the language of Atos & Workfare all over again.

It didn’t work then, it won’t work now.

That is why we are calling for a local day of action on Monday 4th March 2024, 2 days before the spring budget, which we hope local DPAC groups and our UK coalition allies across the devolved nations will organise and participate in alongside the main London action.

The london protest will meet at 12 noon
At Department of Work & Pensions
Caxton House
6–12 Tothill Street
London SW1H 9NA

The London protest will have BSL translation of speakers

Some funding is available for travel costs; please email DPAC [email protected] if you need support with this


Graphic to use on social media with hashtag #NoMoreBenefitDeaths

Please use the following descriptive text with the image:

Image says
#NoMoreBenefitDeaths
National Day of Action
Monday 4th March
12 noon london action

Image depicts white flowers on the grass as disabled people and allies gather to remember disabled people we’ve lost as a result of social security reforms and austerity

Underneath image
Department of Work and Pensions
Caxton House
6-12 Tothill Street
London SW1H 9NA
DPAC logo to right hand side of address

60
 
 

We Don't Agree on Capitalism: Demarcating the Red and Black

https://wedontagree.net/we-dont-agree-on-capitalism-(essay)

@anarchism

61
 
 
62
 
 

From the Washington Post:

ASHEVILLE, N.C. — When the managers of a small bookstore in this Appalachian mountain town received a call from a distributor wondering if they could take in 22,000 books rejected by a Florida school district, it felt like a colossal ask.

Firestorm Books usually stocks fewer than 8,000 books — titles that range from historical fiction to solarpunk. The self-described queer feminist collective wasn’t sure where they’d put them, and their customers typically weren’t looking for picture books.

“We were like, this feels like a bigger thing than we can manage,” said Libertie Valance, a managing member of the group that runs the store. “But I think even in that conversation, there was an acknowledgment that we were going to do it.”

And so began the journey to bring eight tons of books — most of them banned under Florida’s state laws restricting classroom discussion on race, gender identity and sexual orientation — from Duval County Public Schools in Jacksonville to left-leaning Asheville.

63
64
65
 
 

cross-posted from: https://szmer.info/post/2107707

66
 
 

BE

This note is available in:

  • English 🇺🇸 : see below
  • Spanish 🇲🇽: ver más abajo
  • Portuguese 🇧🇷: clique no link

English 🇺🇸

This Saturday and Sunday, the 20th and 21st, the Libertarian Socialist Organization held the second session of the First Congress of the OSL "Juan Carlos Mechoso" - in homage to the historic militant of the Uruguayan Anarchist Federation, who died in 2022. The event in São Paulo brought together delegations from the organization's nuclei, which operate in different regions of Brazil.

After the first session, which laid the foundations of the OSL and launched our organization on July 8 and 9 last year, this second stage advanced the organization's internal workings and the militants' political training.

The 1st Congress of the OSL will have its next and final session later this year when the organization's program will be finalized. We left the meeting with more strength and energy to continue building popular struggles in the country with combativeness and class independence!

For Social Revolution and Libertarian Socialism! Long live the OSL!

Spanish 🇲🇽

Este sábado y domingo, 20 y 21, la Organización Socialista Libertaria realizó la segunda sesión del I Congreso de la OSL “Juan Carlos Mechoso” - en homenaje al histórico militante de la Federación Anarquista Uruguaya fallecido en 2022. El evento en São Paulo reunió delegaciones de las filiales de la organización, que actúan en diferentes regiones de Brasil.

Después de la primera sesión, que sentó las bases de la OSL y lanzó nuestra organización los días 8 y 9 de julio del año pasado, esta segunda etapa ha avanzado en el funcionamiento interno de la organización y en la formación política de los militantes.

El 1er Congreso de la OSL celebrará su próxima y última sesión a finales de este año, momento en el que se ultimará el programa de la organización. Salimos de la reunión con más fuerza y energía para seguir construyendo luchas populares en el país, ¡con combatividad e independencia de clase!

¡Por la Revolución Social y el Socialismo Libertario! ¡Viva la OSL!

67
 
 

Basically what the title says. I tend to lean anarchist but I'm not opposed to reading some Soviet sympathetic literature since I like to expand my horizons.

Edit: to be more specific. Parenti describes life in the Soviet Union as largely comfortable, perhaps too comfortable. People's needs are largely met. They have economic security. Most folks are quite skeptical of the news, "I know of all these disasters happening around the world but I don't know anything that's happening in my own country" and a general disbelief in the true news about the problems in capitalist countries. This results in a disatisfaction, particularly among the intelligencia and beauracracy, that results in the top down disollution of the USSR. From there he describes shock therapy and the deprevation that resulted.

How good is his research? How good are his sources? I believe quite strongly that we live in the most sophisticated propoganda machine ever devised. That makes me skeptical of a lot of the common narratives about the USSR but more than just the US is capable of lying and I'm curious how willing Parenti is to believe in obvious falsehood.

It should be noted he does criticize the USSR but at the end of the day believes in the project of state communism.

68
 
 

Hey all, I started my dive into anarchism a little over a year ago and I've read a lot of the anarchy/socialism 101 type books but I'm starting to find a lot of it repetitive. I'm looking for suggestions to deepen my understanding of anarchism and libertarian socialism. Especially praxis and tactics, a lot of theory that I've come across doesn't really get into the weeds about applying it, and as someone in an area with no leftist orgs to speak of (outside of a small DSA chapter), I don't have anyone local to go to in order to learn from.

I want to start putting all of this knowledge to use in my area but I'm not 100% sure where to start or how to avoid some of the pitfalls of organizing. Any suggestions would be much appreciated!

69
 
 

Two episodes in so far:

Episode #193 - The main export of the western world is trash. - Anarchism Pt. 2 (Bookchin, Social Ecology)

Episode #192 - Should we overthrow the government tomorrow? - Anarchism Pt. 1 (Chomsky, Malatesta)

more episodes to come.

If you have not heard this show so far, it has been running for something like 10 years, is very well presented and well worth a listen.

70
71
 
 

Some of you (especially in the UK) might have read a piece in Freedom News about using the French Reseau Mutu (Mutu Network) as a model for the possibility of a connected series of sites for radical information and mutual aid in different areas. Imagine it: instead of Facebook groups or Twitter profiles (eurgh) or disparate, disconnected "silos" of info or walled gardens, a one-stop space for anti-capitalist, anti-fascist news and shared updates about local actions, events, protests, meetings, campaigns, resources, and more. Each region having its own online "community."

I've arrived at the conclusion that the Fediverse, even specifically Lemmy and especially Beehaw, offer an example of the template that this could be built on. If anyone's interested in the idea, let me know.

Apologies for that "media activist manifesto" being so very long, but it took a lot of research to argue that this is a good opportunity for anarchist media/info!

72
 
 

Listen

Countless tributes have been paid by friends, fellow campaigners and colleagues following the death of Alan Benson, an “astounding campaigner and ambassador” who played a major role in the fight for an accessible transport system.

As well as being co-chair of Transport for All, he was a long-serving deputy chair of London TravelWatch, a founder member of the Campaign for Level Boarding, and co-chaired the Department for Transport’s inclusive transport stakeholder group.

Transport for All (TfA) said it was “heartbroken” by his death on Sunday and described him as “an astounding campaigner and ambassador for the disabled community”.

Benson (pictured) was awarded an MBE for services to public transport for disabled people last year.

He described at the time how his activism began when – as a powerchair-user – he was left stranded on a train platform in the run-up to the London 2012 Paralympics.

He had secured a degree in computing and economics, and a masters in management innovation and change, and used those skills mostly in jobs in further and higher education before moving to London in 2011.

He told TfA last year: “I moved to London and started regularly commuting around 2012, when the plans for the Paralympics were in full swing, and there was this huge push from the government to present London as an accessible capital.

“And then, while there was all this publicity about the legacy of the Paralympics, how accessible our transport was, what an example London was going to be, I was left stranded on a train platform.”

After attending a couple of parliamentary meetings on accessible transport and contributing to a Channel 4 investigation, he was introduced to TfA and became a board member.

He then played a key role in a series of TfA campaigns, including the battles to make Crossrail accessible; to ensure reliable, accessible patient transport; and to improve access to rail stations.

He told TfA in 2022: “The campaigns I remember are the ones that make the greatest amount of change, even if they’re not obvious, even if most people won’t see them.

“So, for example, there is now a new standard of lift signage across the London Underground: it makes a lot more sense, is less technical, more human, more accessible. And a lot of people won’t have noticed this change.

“But for many disabled people, this makes a huge difference to their ability to navigate stations and move through the world freely.

“I’m also really proud of the training we did with senior staff at the Underground.

“Often the most important work we do is changing attitudes, changing industry standards, because this is what results in lasting, widespread change.”

He stressed the importance of collaboration and co-production and the support of other campaigners, organisations, charities, transport operators and allies.

Last year, he was given the freedom of the borough of Richmond, where he lived, and the council’s leader, Gareth Roberts, spoke this week of his “remarkable contribution to the lives of disabled and older people, particularly in London” and his “immeasurable legacy”.

The user-led charity Ruils, which is based in south-west London, paid tribute to the “major role” he played – which included nearly seven years as a board member – and said it would miss his “drive, determination and wry humour”.

His influence and popularity were reflected this week in the many online messages of condolence from fellow disabled activists and industry professionals.

Among the messages left on an online tribute page, many spoke of his kindness, generosity and sense of humour, as well as his “massive contribution to improving transport accessibility”.

One said: “Heartbroken. Alan was the most fearless of campaigners – his legacy will live on and we can but try our best to carry on with his work the best we can – he has changed the life of so many.”

Another described him as “one of the kindest, wisest and best people you could ever meet”.

Among the messages from industry figures, Andy Lord, London’s transport commissioner, said the news of his death was “absolutely devastating and heart-breaking”.

Peter Wilkinson, managing director of passenger services at the Department for Transport, said: “Alan was a star and a truly committed and passionate champion of passengers. He will leave a giant hole behind him.”

London TravelWatch – London’s statutory transport watchdog – said it was “devastated” by his death and that he was “held in deep affection by everyone here”.

Tony Jennings, a fellow co-founder of the Campaign for Level Boarding, said Benson was “a friend and a pragmatic disability rights campaigner, who worked tirelessly in collaboration with the transport industry to help improve accessibility and remove the barriers.

“He was a supportive advocate for disabled people and generous with his time, leaving a legacy for other campaigners and activists to continue the fight for equal access.”

He said they shared a “passion for cricket and cake”, with Benson a loyal supporter of Surrey, who would frequently post on Twitter about his frequent trips to the Oval.

He said: “He will be greatly missed by family, friends and the disabled community.

“Strength to Yvonne, his soulmate and constant support at this terribly sad time.”

Another accessible transport campaigner, Doug Paulley, described Benson as “a true diplomat, committed campaigner and gentleman” and said his death was “a giant loss”.

He said: “I got to know him through the First Bus case, where he was a stalwart supporter, and have conspired with him ever since, along with his lovely partner Yvonne.

“But he also had become a firm friend, with his cheeky and impish sense of humour yet kindly advising and reeling me in where required.

“I mourn his loss for me, for disabled and other groups he supported, but particularly for his friends and his lovely partner.”

73
 
 

Listen

Disabled activists and allies came together in parliament this week to call for an end to the degrading treatment, dehumanisation and even torture that young disabled people are subjected to in institutional care settings.

Members of the End Torture of Disabled People campaign described how a series of media exposés and inquiries have revealed abuse of disabled children and young people in care homes, residential special schools and mental health institutions.

Ellen Clifford, a member of the national steering group of Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) and author of The War on Disabled People, said that behind these scandals was “a culture that violates people’s rights and allows degrading treatment”.

Among the scandals she highlighted were those at children’s homes in Doncaster run by Hesley Group, which is owned by a private equity firm; those at homes run by Calcot Services for Children; mental health units run by The Huntercombe Group; and failures by Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust.

She said that these examples of torture and abuse “are not anomalies” but are “part of a wider system, where physical restraint and seclusion rooms are used as common practice”.

She said disabled children and young people are placed in settings many miles from home, where they are traumatised, and then punished when they respond to that trauma.

“Thus, their distress escalates, their trauma is entrenched, and they’re told that services within the community cannot cope with them, so they become trapped within abusive institutions.”

The campaign aims to eliminate the use of these segregated settings, and end the torture, violence and abuse of young disabled people across such services.

It is led by the The Alliance for Inclusive Education, and backed by DPAC, Reclaiming Our Futures Alliance (ROFA) and other disabled people’s organisations including WinVisible, Sisters of Frida and Deaf Ethnic Women’s Association (DEWA).

Simone Aspis, who set up Inclusion London’s Free Our People Now project, which is led by people with learning difficulties and autistic people, described how one autistic young person ended up in an inpatient psychiatric unit after failing to cope with the “personal torture” of trying to fit in with her school’s inaccessible learning environment.

She said a “pipeline” led from disabled children being provided with no support in mainstream schools, to pupil referral units, to special schools, to residential schools, to mental health services and finally to psychiatric inpatient care.

She said: “At the moment, disabled young people and children, the only time they only have any rights is when they’re detained under the Mental Health Act.”

Aspis said the voices of people with learning difficulties and autistic people had been missing from the debate.

She said there was a need to end all forms of segregated institutions, and that the regulators, the Care Quality Commission and Ofsted, as well as the Crown Prosecution Service, “really must get tough” with the “torture and inhumane and degrading treatment” that was taking place in segregated institutions.

Michelle Daley, ALLFIE’s director, said it was vital to remember the “legacies of the past”, such as the eugenics movement and the institutionalisation of disabled people.

She said: “We’re still using words like special education, special needs, as if it’s a favour rather than a right.

“We’re still not talking about justice… in terms of our emancipation and liberation as disabled folks.

“We want real justice and real rights, we want to talk about the desegregation of these disabled people, and we can’t continue to have the legacy of eugenics which is keeping us held back, and basically killing too many disabled people.”

Mark Harrison, a member of ROFA’s steering group and author of a new book on working with young disabled people*, blamed successive governments for failing to implement key parts of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), including articles 19 (on independent living) and 24 (on inclusive education).

He said the last Labour government decided to listen to “the lobbying voices of the segregationists and the professionals”, with the damage caused by that decision “enhanced and multiplied many times by successive Conservative governments”.

He said this had “made segregated education a cornerstone of their educational policies with the resulting disastrous situation we find ourselves in today”, with the “reinstitutionalisation of disabled children and young people in residential institutions”.

The campaign has heard how one autistic teenager – who is being supported by DPAC – has been “tormented” and left terrified by her treatment within a series of privately-run psychiatric intensive care units.

During an eight-month period, Lucy Hughes, who is just 14, was repeatedly pinned down by six support staff who had little experience or training, before she was injected with drugs, stripped of her clothes and placed in seclusion.

Her parents also saw hospital staff dragging 12-year-old children around by their collar or their clothes, “shouting and swearing at autistic children as they cried on the floor”.

The members of ALLFIE’s campaign group say they are “increasingly outraged” by the exposure of disabled young people to “neglect, violence, torture, rape and death” in institutions.

They want to hold to account those commissioning these services, professionals and staff, and end the use of institutional and segregated settings, replacing them with a national independent living service and an inclusive education service.

But they also want to ensure that the voices of the young disabled people affected by the abuse are no longer missing from the debate.

Lucy Wing, a member of ALLFIE’s Our Voice project, which aims to amplify disabled young people’s voices, told the meeting: “Despite decades of disabled people sharing their experiences of segregation in education and organisations campaigning for change, special schools and residential institutions are still the norm for disabled children and young people.”

She said that those responsible for the abuse, assaults, negligence and torture needed to be held accountable.

She said: “We need an explanation to why the countless reports weren’t followed up on.

“We need the reason why these schools were considered good despite evidence of abuse.

“We need national recognition that this is the reality, but it does not have to be.”

John McDonnell, the Labour MP and former shadow chancellor who sponsored the event, said disabled people had become “economic units to be profited from”, both by providers of residential care but also by the pharmaceutical industry.

He said there was a need for “a new civil rights movement” that focused on desegregation and exposed the abuse and the failure of existing provision and regulation, exposing both the results of privatisation but also failures within the public sector.

He called for new legislation on civil rights for disabled people around desegregation.

He said: “If you look at all those civil rights movements in the past, they’ve largely been based upon the exposure of a segregated society.

“And I don’t think in our community at the moment there’s a full and thorough understanding of how much segregation has gone on with regard to people with disabilities.”

He added: “Don’t underestimate direct action. That’s what we’ve done in the past. Because sometimes it’s needed to shake the place up a bit about what we’re doing.”

Navin Kikabhai, ALLFIE’s chair, said it was a “travesty”, after more than 25 years in the education sector, that he found himself increasingly supporting disabled young people who had been “locked away in residential settings”.

And he said it was “embarrassing” to see other countries “far exceeding” the UK in meeting their responsibilities under the UNCRPD, including article 15, which covers freedom from torture.

Claire Glasman, from WinVisible, said mothers who were part of the Disabled Mothers’ Rights Campaign had had their children taken away and placed in abusive institutions.

She said: “Today, more children are in care than ever. Councils take children from low-income single mothers, disabled mothers, from care leavers, and women who report domestic violence.

“Children of colour and/or disabled children are disproportionately targeted.”

And Maresa Mackeith, ALLFIE’s youth parliamentary officer, said: “Children and young people continue to experience being dehumanized by so-called trusted people.

“We are calling for segregated provision such as these institutions to be phased out and for all disabled children and young people to be included in their communities as a right with the support they need.”

*Labels are for Jars not People: Emancipatory Approaches to Working with Young Disabled People, by Mark Harrison

Picture: (From left to right) Simone Aspis, Michelle Daley and Lucy Wing

A note from the editor:

Please consider making a voluntary financial contribution to support the work of DNS and allow it to continue producing independent, carefully-researched news stories that focus on the lives and rights of disabled people and their user-led organisations.

Please do not contribute if you cannot afford to do so, and please note that DNS is not a charity. It is run and owned by disabled journalist John Pring and has been from its launch in April 2009.

Thank you for anything you can do to support the work of DNS…

Donate

74
 
 

Listen

Disabled people who are still shielding from Covid have far less trust in the government than the general public and are far more likely to believe it handled the pandemic very badly, a survey has found.

The survey also found that immunocompromised people are far more likely to be experiencing poor mental health.

But those still shielding from the virus reported much higher levels of political participation.

The survey aimed to investigate how continuing vulnerability to COVID-19 affected people’s political engagement and mental health.

Forsaken but Engaged, a report on the survey findings, found that those immunocompromised people who participated in the survey “experienced higher levels of worry due to COVID-19, poorer mental health, lower perceptions of representation, lower trust in government, and poorer satisfaction in democracy and in terms of how the government has handled the pandemic”.

Four years on from the identification of the virus, more than 1.2 million immunocompromised people are still believed to be at high risk because their conditions and medications make the Covid vaccines ineffective.

Many are either still shielding or living restricted lives, trapped in “enforced isolation”.

The survey results were compared with a survey of the wider public.

Compared to the general population, immunocompromised people reported much higher levels of concern about the long-lasting negative impact of the pandemic on society (91 per cent were worried, compared with 60 per cent of the general public).

Nearly one in four (24 per cent) of those who are immunocompromised reported poor mental health, compared to nine per cent of the general public.

When asked to rate their level of trust in the government (on a scale from 0 to 10, where zero means “do not trust at all”), the average for immunocompromised people was just 1.19, two points lower than the general public (3.18).

And seven in 10 immunocompromised people said the government had handled the pandemic very badly, compared to three in 10 of the general public.

But their experiences of prolonged shielding appear to have increased their levels of political engagement.

Compared to the general public, in the past 12 months, 71 per cent of immunocompromised people said they had contacted a politician or government official, against just 18 per cent of the general public.

And 88 per cent said they had signed a petition (against 40 per cent of the general public), while nearly three-fifths (58 per cent) said they had posted or shared something about politics online (against 17 per cent of the general public).

Among its recommendations, the report calls for action to support and protect people who are still shielding, and those who may need to shield from a virus in the future.

It also calls on the Department of Health and Social Care, and the wider government, to recognise the psychological needs of those who have been shielding.

And it says the government should ensure those who are immunocompromised have adjustments put in place to allow them to vote in-person safely.

The Forsaken but Engaged inquiry was a collaborative project between the universities of Liverpool and Bath; the all-party parliamentary group on vulnerable groups to pandemics; Forgotten Lives UK – which campaigns on behalf of the 1.2 million people who are still at high risk from Covid because of a compromised immune system – and the national expert group for immunocompromised patients.

Mark Oakley, co-leader of Forgotten Lives UK, said: “This report highlights the stark contrast between the immunocompromised, who are still shielding, and the general population.

“They are now heading into their fourth Christmas shielding and this report shows how they are being ignored.

“The scale of increasing mental health issues caused by the isolation and the problems it is building for the future is shocking and this needs to be addressed urgently to protect their mental and physical health.

“It is no wonder that the report shows the level of dissatisfaction of government handling of the pandemic is double that of the general population.

“Those in this position have shown a stronger desire to vote, take part in political activities, and are four times more likely to try to contact their MP.

“It underlines that those affected by this need to be engaged with properly on all levels by politicians and facilitated to be able to do so safely.”

Dr Luca Bernardi, a senior lecturer in politics at the University of Liverpool, and one of the report’s authors*, said: “Our findings reveal that Covid is not a thing of the past for immunocompromised people, who feel left behind and unrepresented by the political system and whose trust in government is way lower in comparison with the general public.”

*The other author was Dr Jo Daniels, senior lecturer and clinical psychologist at the University of Bath

_A note from the editor:

Please consider making a voluntary financial contribution to support the work of DNS and allow it to continue producing independent, carefully-researched news stories that focus on the lives and rights of disabled people and their user-led organisations.

Please do not contribute if you cannot afford to do so, and please note that DNS is not a charity. It is run and owned by disabled journalist John Pring and has been from its launch in April 2009.

Thank you for anything you can do to support the work of DNS…_

Donate

75
view more: ‹ prev next ›