this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
99 points (94.6% liked)

Open Source

33438 readers
310 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I accidentaly stumbled upon this newish browser (even has IPFS support) called LibreWeb Any thoughts ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (7 children)

This is the de-mozillaed Firefox right? I’ve heard of it recently too. IPFS sounds really cool but isn’t it a dud because it uses a singular gateway or something?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No, you're thinking of LibreWolf. This is like an IPFS browser that interprets markdown to render simple sites within the IPFS network

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Now Markdown needs a decent spec, but that is cool

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I always forget, is CommonMark good enough? Like with table and image support?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I like it! It's not much more than good enough, but that's good enough

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Yup. If the standard gets too complicated, it starts to get hard to implement and use, and feature restriction might be necessary for certain use-cases. We want to keep it "good enough" because that ensures it's simple and easy to use, rather than something more capable but more complex like HTML.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you have a moment, could you enlighten me as to what this singular gateway LibreWolf uses refers to per the top level users comment? Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

They weren't talking about LibreWolf when making the comment about the singular gateway, they were talking about IPFS. But it's right there, you can read it again. Or even ask the original commenter, either by directly replying to them or by tagging them, e.g. @[email protected] can you answer @[email protected]'s question?

load more comments (4 replies)