this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)

Photography

0 readers
128 users here now

All things photography. Share your own original photos, your questions, your inspiration.

Rules

Share your own original photography. No NSFW images. Be Nice.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Schuylkill Co-Generation Plant and Arsenal Bridge, Philadelphia, 2018.

Industrial-strength pixels at https://www.flickr.com/photos/mattblaze/42660696454/

#photography

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

This was captured with the Rodenstock 70mm/5.6 HR Digaron-W lens and the Phase One IQ3-100 back. A bit of vertical shift was used to keep everything straight. A 1/2 sec exposure provided just the right amount of motion blur for the passing train.

The power plant generates electricity (now oil fired, converted from coal) as well as steam for Philly's Center City steam loop. The rail bridge extends the former Pennsylvania Railroad's "High Line" into south Philly's Greenwich rail yard.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I shot several versions of this, with exposures that kept the moving train sharp or blurred it to varying degrees. I think this was the most successful attempt, with the train blurred enough to suggest motion, but not so much that it's unrecognizable.

Depicting motion is sometimes a central part of a still photograph.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Power plants are often regarded as utilitarian eyesores, and are rarely (generally under public pressure) built to look beautiful or interesting, (London's Battersea Power Station was an exception). Generally, like here, any beauty to be found is accidental, a direct consequence of interesting form happening to follow from function.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

@[email protected] as a fan of brutalism, I like power plant design

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)