this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
408 points (99.0% liked)

Not The Onion

13185 readers
2254 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 166 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)

Number of federal employees

1970: 2.8 million

2024: 3.0 million

US Population

1970: 203 million

2024: 340 million

All they do is lie. Federal employees make life better for all, and all they've ever seen is shrinking resources and more workload.

Fuck Republicans and fuck everyone who votes for this shit.

American lives will get worse, and unfortunately the morons who vote for this are too fucking stupid to connect dots and realize how nice their lives are with what government does for them.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Just to look at that a different way, 1970 = 1 fed employee for every 72.5 citizens, 2024 = 1 fed employee for every 113.3 citizens. Add on top of that a budget that likely has not increased proportionally, and the strain gets even greater. So it sounds like our government is able to operate half as effectively as it was in the 70s, and they think that is too much.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (5 children)

operate half as effectively

I think you mean double effective. Seeing as each fed needs to cater for double the populace.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We mean the same thing I believe. I phrased it thinking of how on a per citizen basis they now only have half a fed workers time they used to, while your phrasing comes at it from the employee has to do twice as much with the same resources.

I'll concede I probably was not clear in the way I intended and I appreciate you reframing my thoughts for me. 😅

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No you're right. Now that I've slept on it I see your point. When looking from the population perspective there are half as many fed agents available so they are half as effective (increased wait times, reduction of services etc).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We have succeeded in getting each other to see it though the other person's perspective, so this has turned into a better comment chain than probably 90% of political posts! 😁

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What fresh hell is this humanity of people getting along and coming to understandings?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)