this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
-5 points (40.0% liked)

World News

33577 readers
473 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Seems like it's Macron who's rejecting the truth that US and Russia are going to negotiate the end of the proxy war while Europe is left out in the cold.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

If by "negotiate an end..." you mean carve Ukraine up for mineral and land rights, then I suppose that's probably accurate enough.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Sure yeah, that's why the war should've been avoided, but Europeans cheered for this and now here we are.

[–] n2burns 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And how could this war have been avoided?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Plenty of western experts have discussed this very issue for many decades now. It's rather concerning that you're entirely unaware of that.

50 prominent foreign policy experts (former senators, military officers, diplomats, etc.) sent an open letter to Clinton outlining their opposition to NATO expansion back in 1997:

George Kennan, arguably America's greatest ever foreign policy strategist, the architect of the U.S. cold war strategy warned that NATO expansion was a "tragic mistake" that ought to ultimately provoke a "bad reaction from Russia" back in 1998.

Jack F. Matlock Jr., US Ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1987-1991, warning in 1997 that NATO expansion was "the most profound strategic blunder, [encouraging] a chain of events that could produce the most serious security threat [...] since the Soviet Union collapsed"

Even Gorbachev warned about this.