this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
34 points (88.6% liked)

PC Gaming

9671 readers
1573 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
EXiLExJD
UncleBadTouch
[email protected]
34
AMD, Don't Screw This Up (inv.nadeko.net)
submitted 1 day ago by alessandro to c/pcgaming
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is an EVEN BIGGER opportunity than AMD had with Intel to have a "Ryzen moment".

With trash uplifts (5070 may not even beat the 4070Super) and blatantly swapping of the names of their GPUs (the 5080 is XX70-level hardware -- at best).... Nvidia has effectively doubled the price of GPUs in a few short years.

If AMD decided to finally not just-follow-Nvidia, I would RUN to buy a $550-600 RX9070XT with RTX5080 performance.

"$550-600? That's unrealistic, Brad, you fuckin' idiot!"

Fuck off. $1,000 RTX5080 performance is twice what the $500 two-gens-old RTX3070 had. And also....

  • The $599 RTX4070 Super had twice the performance of the two-gens-old $499 RTX2070 Super
  • The $499 RTX3070 had twice the performance of the two-gens-old $379 GTX1070
  • The $499 RTX2070 Super had twice the performance of the two-gens-old $329 GTX970
  • The $379 GTX1070 had twice the performance of the two-gens-old $399 GTX770
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

There's no opportunity. Intel sat on their ass for years, but NVIDIA is actually innovating. One bad-to-mediocre gen won't do anything, especially since AMD decided to sit out the high-end market this time.

They also have to follow NVIDIA, because they're just too big. If AMD introduced the RT and ML hardware six years ago, nobody would have cared, because they had like 15% market share. Now it's even worse and AMD has to fight for the scraps with Intel.