Ghazi
A community for progressive issues, social justice and LGBT+ causes in media, gaming, entertainment and tech.
Official replacement for Reddit's r/GamerGhazi
Content should be articles, video essays, podcasts about topics relevant to the forum. No memes, single images or tweets/toots/... please!
Community rules:
Be respectful and civil with each other. Don't be a jerk. There is a real human being on the other side of your screen. See also the Blahaj.Zone Community Rules
No bigotry of any kind allowed. Making racist, sexist, trans-/homo-/queerphobic, otherwise demeaning and hateful comments is not ok. Disabilities and mental illnesses are not to be used as insults and should not be part of your comment unless speaking of your own or absolutely relevant.
No gatekeeping and being rude to people who don't agree with you. Leave “gamer” stereotypes out of your comment (e.g. sexless, neck bearded, teenaged, basement-dwelling, etc). Don't compare people to animals, or otherwise deny their humanity. Even if you think someone is the worst human on the planet, do not wish death or harm upon them.
No "justice porn". Posts regarding legal action and similar is allowed, but celebrating someone being harmed is not.
Contrarianism for its own sake is unnecessary and not welcome.
No planning operations, no brigading, no doxxing or similar activities allowed.
Absolutely no defense of GamerGate and other right-wing harassment campaigns, no TERFs and transphobia, racism, dismissing of war crimes and praise of fascists. This includes “JAQing off”, intentionally asking leading questions while pretending to be a neutral party. This also applies to other forms of authoritarianism and authoritarian or criminal actions by liberal or leftist governments.
NSFW threads, such as ones discussing erotic art, pornography and sex work, must be tagged as such.
Moderators can take action even if none of the rules above are broken.
view the rest of the comments
I'm pretty sure that the pasty white makeup had nothing to do with patriarchy. The men were not insisting that women wear such makeup. There was no rule or law that women make themselves pasty white.
That was a rich person thing. As in, the women in the higher classes used it as a tool to separate themselves from the riffraff/poor people who had to work in the sun all day (and thus, got tanned).
So not only was it limited to the rich it was something the women thrusted upon themselves. I'm sure there's endless genetic evidence that the rich/royalty/noble equivalent men had loads of children with working women who weren't wearing such makeup.
The society itself was super patriarchal but the pasty white makeup wasn't even tangentially related to that.
So the society's power structures were super patriarchal, and the makeup was tied to power, but there wasn't even a tangential relationship there?
You got a source for that claim that the women thrust it on themselves?
And even if that's 100% correct, just because some hypothetical woman was an ancient tastemaker doesn't mean that the women who were sold into concubinage had any say in the way they were expected to present themselves in society.
Patriarchy is the wrong word to describe it. It's no different than men taking risky jobs in order to make more money in an attempt to be more attractive.
Beauty and attraction have fads and at that time pasty white makeup was the trend for rich women. It had nothing to do with patriarchy.
That society as a whole was super sexist and awful but makeup wasn't part of it.