this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
139 points (97.9% liked)

PC Gaming

10839 readers
586 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 131 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

So, if you have enough money, you can just fire off a shitload of ex-post-facto patents after a competitor releases a prior-art product, sue them, and win using patents that didn't exist when the competitor's product was created????

Might as well just close the whole patent system and leave, there's quite literally no point to obeying it if you can so blatantly steal anything and everything.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

There's no point? There is a point: To protect the rich and powerful. The patent system is serving its purpose here as intended by the people who have been making these rules.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

That is not the official goal of the patent system in any country, and any behavior like that should be stopped.

[–] DebatableRaccoon 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You think the string-pullers would be honest about their goals? It's all about control, making sure the haves keep.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

[–] DebatableRaccoon 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As great a philosophical mainstay as Hanlon's razor is, I find it pretty difficult to believe a system of laws that almost exclusively favour the wealthy, especially when it's people in positions of wealth that write said laws, is some happy accident.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm not saying otherwise, I just have some serious doubts that there are some men in black in some dark room pulling the strings.

[–] DebatableRaccoon 2 points 2 weeks ago

They're definitely in an ivory tower at the least.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)