this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
273 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

15821 readers
1684 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Extreme costs make it too risky to appeal against injustice.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I wouldn't consider these costs extreme, they wouldn't even be the full cost of defending against his ridiculous claims.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

They're extreme relative to the average person's disposable income.

[–] HikingVet 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And a reasonable person isn't going to find themselves in this particular position.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This specific person in this specific case sounds like an asshole, but people who aren't assholes do sometimes lose court cases, and should have the ability to appeal without risking financial ruin.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

He had the ability to appeal, which he used and lost. Then he was presented with another opportunity to appeal, because often you get several chances for this.

He chose instead to seek judicial review of the case, which wasted everyone's time because it was stupid and inappropriate to request a review instead of appealing.

Then he was fined for wasting everyone's time, because otherwise these people will just keep going and wasting taxpayer money on frivolous court proceedings.

[–] HikingVet 3 points 1 day ago

Again, a reasonable person isn't going to rack up 34k in legal bills fighting an $80 dollar ticket. The amount of fuck around is what cost so much.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)