this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
687 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

61850 readers
3820 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 313 points 2 years ago (52 children)

Some day, we'll have a technology sub that isn't polluted with Twitter "news".

[–] [email protected] 476 points 2 years ago (23 children)

It's a tech company that is burning itself to a ground. Hard to take your eyes off of a slow moving car crash.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Never understood why we call them tech companies to be honest. There is nothing technologically interesting at twitter. And if there is... it is never the subject.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago

So I think the main thing is scale—they're tech companies (in the category they're in) because of the engineering required to build & maintain something that operates at the scale they do

And IMO at least in the early years it was pretty impressive what Twitter was capable of in terms of technology.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If I remember, tech companies are generally those whose primary products are digitally based. And technology these days has essentially become synonymous woth the internet.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (48 replies)