Asklemmy

44847 readers

1745 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Do you want free speech lemmy instance like ruqqus (lemmy.ml)

submitted 4 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I want instance eventually like CENSORSHIP FREE where people can say anything, like the voat except no limiters placwd on you and you can SAY ANYTHING whenever you want ans

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago (2 children)

Definitely not. Those instances almost always devolve into right-wing garbage and people spewing slurs for the sake of it. Anyways, the idea of free speech that people online, especially right-wingers and liberals, tend to argue for is sort of flawed and paradoxical. Here's a very good reading on the subject.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago* (last edited 4 years ago) (1 children)

right-wing garbage

garbage

Didnt read it but you seem very biased

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago

Indeed I am. Everyone is biased to a degree, and to think that non-bias is possible is silly. Anyways, you should read the link I sent you. I promise you that it is very interesting, and keep in mind that it isn't anti-free speech. Rather, it is a critique of the common usage of free speech arguments.