LemmyTips

932 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to LemmyTips, community where you can share all the tips, tricks and resources related to Lemmy.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Err.. huh! Is Reddit now conspiring with Google to screw with off-site Fediverse links? (see examples) (lemm.ee)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Near the end of my little 'Euro comics' rant, you may notice how I tried to slip in an offsite link, in this case from my instance, lemm.ee.

Now it looks like it... got blocked, maybe? See the before & after here.

Mateys-- Am I going crazy, or is this something we're going to need to work around, in future?

EDIT: As stated below, re-editing the message (even with the very same link) cleared up the problem. Still, I could see Reddit trying to block content from the Fediverse, the more the FV grows.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

how about manifest version 3 ? do u think that is fine ?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Wasn't aware of this and will have to do a bit more research. I hope it won't interfere as much in firefox with my current extensions and privacy but we'll see. However this what are we supposed to use? Just default back to curl or wget? It's not like there is an abundance other fully-fledged (using their own engine) open source browsers

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

we did this to our selves. we tolerated the use of corporate-made chromium and now we pay the price. there are open source forks of firefox, but a new open source software is needed to ensure browser diversification. i am no expert of browsers but this is the word i hear around all the time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Definitely agree that more browser diversification is needed beyond forks of existing projects.

load more comments (1 replies)