this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
69 points (79.5% liked)

Life Pro Tips

2687 readers
1 users here now

Unlocking the Secrets to Success and Fulfillment!

Rules

  1. Share valuable life pro tips.
  2. Keep it concise and clear.
  3. Stay on-topic.
  4. Respect fellow members.
  5. No self-promotion.
  6. Verify information before sharing.
  7. Avoid illegal or unethical advice.
  8. Report rule violations.

Join us and share your best life pro tips!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Push it out today and you'll save a fortune on birthday presents.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

But you have to take care of the little fucker four time as long before you can kick it out of the house.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is why you should have been working on those kegels ladies.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's finally speak facts: that water doesn't break unless you allow it to break.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wouldn't hanging out in a walkin freezer/fridge or someplace cold freeze said water? That way the baby wouldn't be able to break through the ice and have to wait another day to be born.

I might be getting biology wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I believe you're pretty spot-on. "Crowning" is when the baby emerges with the ice cap on its head (much like a crown). These lucky women are known as "ice queens."

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Babies aren't usually allowed to be born on this day because if they do, they age far far slower than regular people or something because of leap years. Conspiracy time.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No need. The baby won't remember their birth day. Just lie that they were born 28/Feb instead.

When they're old enough to know the truth, they'll also immediately understand why you lied!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

In that scenario, do you round up or down on the date? I'd probably round up, since the 29th of February falls on the date that the 1st of March usually does on most years, right?

[–] Rodeo 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd round down, so their birth month remains the same.

This is critically important for horology, as you cannot upset the balance of the astrological month. Such inconsistencies will inevitably lead to the deformation of your baby's brain causing them to look like those drooling wojaks.

/s because somebody probably actually believes that shit.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Horology is the study of clocks. You probably meant astrology/horoscopes.

For the sake of horoscopes either is fine - the zodiacal sign changes from Aquarius to Pisces somewhere between the 18th and the 21th, way before the end of the month. And most people don't even know the hour that they're born in, even if relevant for the placement of the 12 houses (including the ascendant, the start of the 1st house), and commemorating your birthday a bit before or after has zero to do with it.

Source: I don't believe in astrology but I made some cash in my teenage years selling horoscopes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of Ron Swanson selling flutes to the local cult. Respect the hustle

[–] Rodeo 2 points 1 year ago

Horology is the study of clocks. You probably meant astrology/horoscopes.

Oh yeah, lol. Pretty sure I should have known that

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It's not that much zanier than regular astrology.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'd probably round it down. Not just to keep the same birth month (as Rodeo) said, but also to give it a "we're commemorating it earlier!" vibe.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Just do it alternating - one year Feb 28th, the next Mar 1st

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also be very clear when instructing the nanny to send them to be apprenticed. Pilot can sound a lot like Pirate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, you don't want them living at home when they're eight.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

leap year babies are another strong case in point why we should measure our age in days rather than years. So a leap year baby who has had 8 birthdays (technically 32 years old) has been alive on planet Earth approximately 11,680 days. See? If we keep track of our age by days, there could be no more discriminating against leap year babies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah but then the baby only she's once every 4 years so it'll be a super baby that lives for like 320 years

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yes in theory that sounds fantastic, but the truth is that leap babies age normally right alongside the rest of us but confusion surrounds them 3/4 of their lives' birthdays when they scramble to decide when to celebrate it, their birthdays becoming a never-ending joke they can never escape 😱

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

this sounds personal are you ok

[–] someguy3 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is it really that much of an issue?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, it's a cataclysmic issue. /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn, I thought sarcasm was the official language of Lemmy. All this time I was thinking /s meant /serious

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

/s definitely means serious.

/s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm glad we cleared that up

/s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wait, does it? /s

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Aren't they more likely to only live til they're about 20? They'd only have 1/4 the birthdays as anyone else.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Wait... Wasn't last year a leap year? I swear it's been less than 4 years since the last time it was February 29th...😵‍💫

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I still take issue with the second "2" in "2024". In my mind we're barely into the 3rd millennium.

...what do you mean? Adult people were born after 2000? Bollocks!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This year is divisible by 4

Last year was not

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

No, it's not.