this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
119 points (96.9% liked)

Asklemmy

46264 readers
1085 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Being able to photosynthesize. It wouldn't be that hard either, we already can, just not to make food.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I would stay in relatively achievable things like a sugar fuel cell or microbial food production. Things we don't quite have yet but not do to the knowledge not being there.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Cybernetics hands down.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

genetically engineered housing

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Replicator. But that kinda seems impossible so that Black and Decker rehydrator thingy from Back to the Future II.

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ