this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
3 points (80.0% liked)

Hardware

377 readers
105 users here now

A community for news and discussion about the hardware side of technology.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
3
Don’t Be Alarmed (www.hackster.io)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

A standard, run-of-the-mill home security system is probably good enough for most people. But “most” still leaves room for a lot of exceptions. Installations in rural and remote areas, for instance, run into plenty of issues with traditional solutions due to their reliance on stable internet connectivity. Furthermore, relocating these systems can be cumbersome due to the need to update Wi-Fi credentials and re-register the location of a central hub device.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here