UK Nature and Environment

537 readers

74 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our spring banner is a shot of Walberswick marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Promise to phase out lead from UK game shooting has failed, study finds (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A voluntary promise to phase out toxic lead shot in the UK has failed, meaning wildlife and human health are being put at risk, a study has found.

The vow, made in February 2020 by the UK’s nine leading game shooting and rural organisations, aimed to benefit wildlife and the environment and keep toxic lead out of the human food chain. They aimed to phase lead shot out by 2025, and hoped to avoid a full government ban. It is recommended birds are shot with non-toxic cartridges made of metals such as steel instead.

A study of 171 pheasants killed in the 2024-25 shooting season found that where any shot was still in the carcass all but one had been killed with lead ammunition. The team also analysed shotgun pellets found in red grouse carcasses shot in the same season and on sale through butchers’ shops and online retailers. In all 78 grouse carcasses from which any shot was recovered, the shot was lead.

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A voluntary promise

There's your explanation. If there was a willingness to act, it would have just been banned by the govt.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Isn't it usually a sort of carrot-and-stick deal? As in 'we'll give you a chance to regulate it yourself, but if you don't then we'll force you to do it in a way you might not like'. Seems they've fucked around, and now hopefully they're going to find out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

It reads (to me) like they promised to not use lead shot to avoid a total ban for whatever reason - I don't shoot, so I don't know if there's some benefit to lead over other material for shotgun cartridges which makes it worth dropping noxious materials all over the place.

When it comes to enforcement it's pretty much a pointless cause. You only need to look at the list of "banned" or "restricted" so-called country pursuits and you'll see an equal list of thins5you can spot if you'd go for a short walk a few miles beyond most towns.