this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
910 points (96.4% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

520 readers
1943 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 4 weeks ago
MODERATORS
 

Time to break free of traditional political ideological labeling and divisions. Time to abandon old, divisive sociopolitical labels like "liberal" and "conservative".

A new political party based on a vastly, commonly held virtures lends itself to embrace over 66% of Americans, and it clearly embraces progressive principled thinking. In the most ideal American sense of unity, a political party should not be able to be defined or placed as "to the left" or "to the right" of where the Democratic or Republican parties currently are. Just let it exist organically based on present-day principled thinking. The American Progressive Majority.


Originally Posted By u/Atlanticbboy At 2025-03-23 04:38:18 AM | Source


top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago (26 children)

it's wild that only 55% of you guys want a fairer health care system

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (4 children)

It’s because the phrase “Medicare for all” has been propagandized. If you instead asked if people wanted “affordable medical treatment and preventative care for themselves and others”, I’m sure that number would be much higher.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Ok but now is not a good time to disarm

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The working class must never disarm. Post jan 6th and George floydd and people still have yet to learn that no one will protect us but ourselves. How delusional of me to think anything will ever drive this point home in people's frightened minds.

It would be nice to have some reforms, but that's not what anti gun people want. They want everything. We could pass reforms and somebody will shoot up some gun free zone and people will be back to take more. It's a never ending circle that only stops at fully stripping the right to own a firearm completely. Some aren't even ashamed to admit it.

My body, my choice in how to protect it. Prisons are gun free, prisoners have very few rights. Yet rape / violence in prisons are a running joke everyone enjoys repeating. I will not be a prisoner.

Good luck to OP with their party but I want no part of it. Plus they aren't in favor of legalizing all drugs so you support the police state's right to continue to ruin lives and shoot people for fun with no repercussions. Not to mention the lives lost from tainted unregulated drugs of a unknown potency. Oh and nothing on replacing First-past-the-post voting so we can have more then two parties? Super hard pass. We'd only be 3-4 generations before the capitalist class captures this political party as well. If not less.

If only we could join a commune that best reflects each of our values. OP could be completely unarmed in their commune and mine would have nukes cause humans are psychotic hairless apes that only respect one thing. Overwhelming violence.

SocialistRA.org

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Clearly people aren't voting the same way they're answering surveys. I don't see how forming a new party will make that happen.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I observe the same thing here in The Netherlands. In theory, democracy should work best for the working class majority. In practice, people somehow tend to vote for something not in their own self interest.

Wonderful example is the area where I live, our town shares a border with a Belgian town. Most people do groceries on one side of the border, go to the bar on the other side. In essence, we operate as one town that happens to be in two countries. Ask anyone in the street if they are open to a "Nexit" from the EU, most will say a hard: "No".

Then look at the election results, the party in favor of a Nexit became the largest party, also in the town I live. It's wild that people vote different to what they believe in. If you then ask them: why did you vote for this party, because it contrasts your earlier answer. People will say: "Yeah, but it won't come to that". Then I look at Brexit and it's exactly how that cluster fuck happened.

My brain simply cannot process this idiocracy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I think the key is the term "informed electorate". As Trump said, "I love the uneducated!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago

70% couldn't ve bothered voting knowing it meant democracy's end

Good intentions are important Americans, but you cannot make the world a better place just by having good intentions and navel gazing

[–] [email protected] 92 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Two things.

One, I would get a gun and find a trustworthy community if I were a leftist or minority American.

As much as I despise guns, if shit gets Gilead bad, you'll probably be happy to have it.

As for community, if you don't have one yet, I would recommend joining either a socialist club or a progressive/traditional (i.e. not racist) Christian church. A black church (think MLK), or a pride flag flying liberal Church (think John Brown).

When Nazi's invaded my country, these were the two communities that actually resisted, by fighting back and helping people hide and escape. In times of slavery, socialism wasn't yet a thing, so the abolitionists and underground railroad people were progressive Christians. Jesus was the OG socialist and these communities live it.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Only a little more than half support Medicare for all? Is this a terminology issue, or are 45% of Americans that terrible?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Sadly there's this idea that Americans are being taxed to death, when in reality not so much.

People don't understand that while we'd pay maybe hundreds more in taxes to fund Single Payer, we'd pay THOUSANDS less in healthcare costs, so we still come out ahead

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They also don't understand the "they" part. People who don't support, or at least those I've met, don't understand that "they" doesn't mean the government per se. It means you. The individual. You pay more in health care because of defaults on payments. Because of so many other things. The cost of that gets passed on to you. The individual.

People get stuck in the "I got mine" mentality. They don't see the bigger picture. "Why should I pay for someone else's health care!" is what I commonly hear. My dude, you already do. When you point this out. When you give the stats. They usually shut down and it's"

10 "Why should I pay for someone else's health care!"

20 goto 10

People just can't seem to grasp the wider picture. I'm not sure they want to. Any issue that requires a wider picture sees the same response. Default to previous operation. Repeat operation.

"Oh no! She's stuck in an infinite loop and he's too stupid to realize it." - Professor F

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

But I'm not sick or injured right now, so it won't benefit me at this exact second in time, so why would I want this?

Plus my unstable career, where I'm treated as a number rather than a human, is currently paying for my health insurance. So I don't need any government handouts thankyou very much.

Yeah, checkmate commie.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago

This is a better platform than the Dems provided in 2024. Upvoted and cross-posted.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

These numbers are bullshit.

Who in their right mind actually believes Americans prefer gun control to: abortion care, legal weed, gay marriage, higher minimum wage, and home ownership.

Like regardless of what you or I want for America, that's an actual load of shit. Too many people love their guns, there's literally more guns than people here.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 days ago (9 children)

There are more guns than people because people that own guns own multiple. And people that own a lot of guns own a loooot of guns. 29% of gun owners own five or more guns. It takes like 2 seconds to confirm this shit...

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Too many people love their guns, there's literally more guns than people here.

Loving their guns and wanting better gun control laws aren't two opposite things you know. They can easily go hand in hand. See Canada to the north. Lots of guns, and better gun control laws.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

The current two party system doesn't represent what the majority wants. Both parties work for the super wealthy. Until we get rid of the Democratic and Republican parties nothing good will happen.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 days ago (7 children)

AOC and Bernie are tearing up things! Support them everywhere! Especially on social media.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Our entire US system is set up to make it so that it is essentially (literally) impossible for a third party to win. This article gives a decent basic overview of why: https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4947662-why-a-third-party-presidential-candidate-can-never-win/

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I think you need to somehow get money out of politics or these majorities will continue to be divided.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's not how you cite a source - the point of a citation is to allow the reader to trace, and evaluate, the source of a claim, and the methodology used to arrive there. I get that it's impractical to do a full bibliography, but the way this poster just 'cites' a bunch of organizations without tracing specific claims to specific publications detracts from the argument. We should be better than the enemy who make claims and respond with "do your own research" when challenged. Part of the reason why we're in this mess is because we stopped supporting, or trusting, the process behind evidence-based science. If we make these claims, can't we link to a site that lists the actual papers behind the claims? Otherwise this whole stuff is vulnerable to the argument that "this is a radical left delusion and fake news". Fascist propaganda shouldn't be resisted in kind, that just drags us down to their level.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Be all that as it may, but sweet fuck all percent of you actually vote, so what difference will it make?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (11 children)

I’m sad that trans rights aren’t on the list there, not surprised with how awful things are but still sad

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I don't believe e any of these numbers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Any party that tries to be created with populism but ignores the materialist analyist of how we got to this point and how to combat reactionary thinking and regressivism (which is conservatism, which is why its a universal flaw) will only fall to the same tactics and pitfalls that have led us to this division in the first place. We need a true worker's parry that understands that division of power and group interests lay on class lines (capitalists vs workers) and not on any of the manufacturered scapegoat ones. Progressive ideas are popular yes, but they need to come with actual systematic analysis or they will just morph into right-wing populism through lack of critical thinking and bad actors.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (12 children)

Then why didn't they fucking vote for it?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I agree with almost all of these but some of these numbers were definitely pulled out of someone’s ass

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (18 children)

I appreciate and agree with the sentiment, but I think a call to form an entirely new political party demonstrates a naivety with regards to how the American political system works. It's just not going to happen. A third party will NEVER displace one of the two major parties without massive changes to the electoral system that would likely require a Constitutional Amendment.

Our system and political culture is just not structured to allow for 3rd parties. What's more, the 2 major parties have ingrained themselves into the system so much that they have MASSIVE institutional advantages over a 3rd party.

This will never be a successful effort. I think a better goal would be to co-opt and take over the Democratic Party, booting out all the Vichy collaborationists like Schumer, Jefferies, Newsom, Adams, Pelosi, etc, and remaking the party.

With a new 3rd party, best case scenario is it has 0 impact. If it does get any votes, it'll just divide the anti-fascist vote with the Democrats (and any other 3rd parties) making it even more difficult to win.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago (23 children)

The 2 biggest demographics of growing gun owners are women of color and trans people.

The idea that we should disarm the working class to further concentrate weapons in the hands of militarized forces who are known for abusing their power with impunity is just moronic.

I think the 50501 movement is more tepid centrist neo liberalism and thats the last thing we need here. We need real leftism. You dint fight the far rught with the right leaning center you fight it with leftism. And karl marx one of the fathers of modern leftist thinking said it best/“ any attempt to disarm the workers should be frustrated by force if necessary” the government acting like a nanny state and prohibiting things deemed dangerous by those at the top is never effective. Drugs and alcohol prohibition onky made things worse except for those profiting from exploiting prohibition

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Yes, Dems need to give up on gun control. My wife and I are lifeling Dems and just bought each other handguns and range time for valentines day. We feel we will be needing guns

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 days ago (17 children)

90% of the US don't want more gun control laws. As a percentage that would be saying that every state in the US except Texas wants more gun laws ... it's not right.

I consider myself liberal, but would never support taking away someone's rights. Own all the guns and even a fucking tank if you want ... but you will go to jail if you harm someone with them.

We were given the right to have firearms for the exact situation that is happening now.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›