Cryptocurrency News & Discussion

42 readers
1 users here now

The leading community for cryptocurrency news, discussion, and analysis.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1426
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/no_face on 2023-12-23 01:59:29+00:00.


By default, many hardware wallets create 24 word seeds. The private key entropy is 128 bits and therefore 12 words are sufficient security. 12 words are also easier to memorize compared to 24 words. The only advantage of 24 words is that if you can verify them reordered for example on trezor. However, if you already have a 12 word seed, you can recover it on most hardware wallets including ellipal.

I wouldn't use the reordered seed word features anyway because I do not want even a single word from my seed touching any computer. I also think memorizing the key adds to safety. You can still split your seed phrase into 4 different pieces and hide them in 4 different places. what is "elite dwarf energy" written on a piece of paper in my bank locker? well its 1/4 of my seed. If someone sees it, they may not even know wtf it is. I would only need to access them if I forget my seed plus I forgot my passphrase or lost my h/w wallet.

The way to create a new 12-word-seed is simple: get a dice and a coin and follow instructions here:

This should give you 12 words, the problem is that the last word has checksum bits that need to be correct. You can try 16 sequential words and one of them should fit. If you have an air-gapped computer, you can get the last word using this:

To memorize your 12 word seed, say the first 4 words the first day, every hour; the first 8 words the next day and the full seed on the 3rd day. Verify every week. You will never forget it.

Good luck.

1427
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/jam-hay on 2023-12-23 00:21:21+00:00.


The UK has often said to be pro-crypto... however you wouldn't get that impression going by the actions/ narrative of the FCA the financial regulatory body that full on used the recent crypto crash to role out new legislation and spread as much fud as possible, none more telling than their home page that links to "Crypto: The Basics".

In fairness they have some valid points... however when you consider the facts/ stats that most of the value in crypto is between BTC/ ETH and they've not only been successful but outperformed most assets over the past decade.. they are clearly bias to the downside with their outdated snapshot charts. The Fud Creation Authority.

1428
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/LoganAH on 2023-12-22 23:32:00+00:00.


Youtube is running advertisements that are blatant scams. I've ran into another one watching various youtube videos, and all essentially depict Michael Saylor going on about a new product or service being offered for Bitcoin. It uses a video of him in his chair and AI technology to depict his voice. They're about a minute long and essentially all the same. It's the age old "send x amount of bitcoin and receive double the amount back.

I thought seeing one was weird, but now I've seen a couple and thought I'd say something to bring awareness about this. I took a screenshot of what the advertisement looks like.

How does this even happen on youtube? Do they not do quality control of the advertisements that they put on their platform? The scam couldn't be anymore in your face, and I get you have to be pretty gullible to fall for it, but this is ridiculous.

I just wanted to bring some attention to it, and apologize if it's been mentioned before.

1429
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/CryptoDaily- on 2023-12-23 00:00:35+00:00.


Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.


 

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.


 

Rules:

  • All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
  • Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
  • Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
  • Comments will be sorted by newest first.

 

Useful Links:


 

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

1430
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/thenycgal on 2023-12-22 21:19:43+00:00.

1431
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/LoganAH on 2023-12-22 23:32:00+00:00.


Youtube is running advertisements that are blatant scams. I've ran into another one watching various youtube videos, and all essentially depict Michael Saylor going on about a new product or service being offered for Bitcoin. It uses a video of him in his chair and AI technology to depict his voice. They're about a minute long and essentially all the same. It's the age old "send x amount of bitcoin and receive double the amount back.

I thought seeing one was weird, but now I've seen a couple and thought I'd say something to bring awareness about this. I took a screenshot of what the advertisement looks like.

How does this even happen on youtube? Do they not do quality control of the advertisements that they put on their platform? The scam couldn't be anymore in your face, and I get you have to be pretty gullible to fall for it, but this is ridiculous.

I just wanted to bring some attention to it, and apologize if it's been mentioned before.

1432
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/SuperSaiyanStacker on 2023-12-22 21:17:16+00:00.

1433
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/thenycgal on 2023-12-22 21:19:43+00:00.

1434
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/SuperSaiyanStacker on 2023-12-22 21:17:16+00:00.

1435
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/smolzino on 2023-12-22 20:16:08+00:00.


As a recent crypto buyer, I am confronted with several factors I didn't know about. I am using Kraken right now, not Kraken pro but standard version. When I went to make a purchase, firstly I was confronted to the fees, which were acceptable. But then I noticed that the price that was asked for BTC was very significant from the market price, by about 500 euros. I learned that this is the spread. In this version of Kraken (mobile app), my only option seems to press "buy" crypto, then I am sent to a screen where I input the amount and then I am shown the new price of the BTC which I guess includes the spread. Is there a more efficient way to buy crypto for long term holding?

1436
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/thelawenforcer on 2023-12-22 20:14:19+00:00.


I'm looking for some DAO tooling that would allow me to create a sort of index fund. Do you know any?

Heres how it would work:

The DAO would weight different assets (ie, 30% USDC, 10% wBTC, 10% ETH, 10% CRV, 10 AAVE, 30% SHIB as an example). This would be static and it wouldn't rebalance.

When a user then sends funds to the DAO contract, it would automatically acquire the assets per the weights the DAO has chosen.

The user would then get a DAOTOKEN back. This would potentially provide governance rights - ie, to propose different weights or different assets etc.

When sending the DAOToken back to the DAO contract, ie redemption, the DAO would automatically liquidate a corresponding portion of the funds and return stablecoins back to the user.

Its similar to Indexed in certain ways, except that the DAO would be able to choose the tokens to include in the index so to speak.

Any ideas or projects doing something similar id be very happy to know about.

1437
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/Feeling-Inside5147 on 2023-12-22 19:49:46+00:00.

1438
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/noduhcache on 2023-12-22 19:30:55+00:00.


It took Litecoin 10 years to reach 100,000,000 transactions. No fancy smart contract operations, no yield farming, mostly just real money transfers and purchases. It took less than 2 years to get the second 100,000,000 transactions. And while omnilite nfts and L'Ordinals have contributed more recently, litecoin probably has about 1/5th the ordinals that BTC has and is still recently exceeding daily BTC transactions repeatedly in recent days. So it's still mostly a medium of transaction story playing out.

Onchain transactions don't tell the whole story. We've all seen chains either 1) completely fake onchain transactions 2) unsustainable incentivize sorta real activity that collapses once the incentives dry up. So it's important to compare onchain data to offchain data to see if they match. Faking things onchain is cheap, just pay small tx fees.

Conversely, faking data at bitpay is not so cheap. You actually have to buy stuff. You're out the fees, and the cost of the items, shipping. Perhaps that's why no altcoin in history every took the number one slot on bitpay until this year. Because it had to happen for real. Which altcoin did it twice this year, first this summer and then last month? And was also the first altcoin to exceed the share of every other altcoin on the platform? Litecoin.

Bitpay stats for July-Nov 2023 available at bitpay dot com slash stats

Bitpay is the oldest largest crypto payments processor I know of, going back to 2011. It's often behind the addition of retailers and infrastructure that makes the news, like Roblox, AMC (including recent Taylor Swift ticketing news) and Newegg, once upon a time, even Steam. They were behind crypto integration with point of sale provider verifone who does 14 billion fiat transactions a year.

As recently as 2020, bitpay stats held Bitcoin at 90% of their transaction share. They added litecoin in 2021 and things changed fast. It hit #2 in 3 months and only ever left the number 2 spot to occasional steal the number 1 slot from the king. It's okay, bitcoin, you still win store of value, and this is why digital silver exists, to help on the transactional side.

But don't just look at one outlet, of course. It'd be nice if all info were consolidated, but it isn't. So you have to look around. Litecoin has always been early to big exchanges and is supported about as broadly as eth and btc there and at other infrastructure. In one infrastructure case, coin atms, we know share numbers thanks to coinatmradar. Wouldn't you know it, the second most popular coin looks familiar.

coinatmradar global stats

The closest I've found to a global scorecard of infrastructure usage is kaiko liquidity. Bear in mind that liquidity ranking usually tilt toward fiat values, so if a lower mcap coin is scoring top 5 alongside coins with mcaps multiple times higher, the reality of its advantage is being massively understated. In Q3, the most recent report I can find, Litecoin is outscoring most of the top ten mcap coins in liquidity.

Kaiko Liquidity Ranking Q3

Those are ordered by mcap, but you see the liquidity score in orange. It's a good indication that litecoin's infrastructure advantage hasn't been priced in by the investor class. That right now, litecoin's adoption is mostly coming from real world users more than traders. It's one of the things I love about it. My strategy is to buy unpriced network effects, and there aren't many of those to be found in crypto. Usually investors buy future network effects at a premium, hoping users will come eventually. Rarely do so many users coalesce w/o an investor pile-on.

All that to say this, yeah, those 200,000,000 transactions are the real deal. As is the 12 year 100% uptime that is unique to litecoin alone. Even Bitcoin's uninterrupted uptime is only just over 10 years. Litecoin has fulfilled the role it aspired to in the early days, to become digital silver.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year from your friendly neighborhood LitecoinFam 🎄 I, for one, could really use that coal I'm getting from santa for being a crypto degen. Gotta keep warm somehow.

1439
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/Perfect_Ability_1190 on 2023-12-22 18:49:56+00:00.

1440
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/TMLutas on 2023-12-22 18:01:16+00:00.


So, a little background. There was this 1970s commercial. It was famous for the older crowd. If you have no idea, somebody put it on YouTube (of course):

This was impossible back in the 1970s. Is it still impossible today given the progress we've made in technology?

Here's the destination for the money, the world's population:

How can we give an account to everyone and put enough money in for 1 Coca-Cola as a one-time thing? How could we do it if we wanted to keep doing it as an ongoing operation?

Preemptively:

  1. Yes, this is goofy, a bit insane, and very silly. Your point? It's a great thought experiment on crypto scaling and testing whether conventional finance would do it better or whether crypto has matured enough that this use case demonstrates a nice, benign utility.
  2. Yes, you're going to have to put some accounts in escrow because your government sanctions certain individuals and nobody wants to go to jail over this. The list will vary depending on what country you're in. Assume that nobody doing this wants to break the law and thus you should include a good faith effort to comply with legal requirements.
  3. If you hate Coca-Cola for whatever reason, don't tell me. Feel free to provide a different product or even a service without the need to seek permission. I don't care.
  4. Yes, Coca-Cola would have to cooperate with this. The less work they would need to do, the better for the purpose of the scenario. Making one account under Coca-Cola's control and have them manage the hard parts is cheating. Since they're ok with playing around with NFTs (as of 2021), they are not going to be too hard a sell if they need only accept money and give out soda.
1441
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/TMLutas on 2023-12-22 18:01:16+00:00.


So, a little background. There was this 1970s commercial. It was famous for the older crowd. If you have no idea, somebody put it on YouTube (of course):

This was impossible back in the 1970s. Is it still impossible today given the progress we've made in technology?

Here's the destination for the money, the world's population:

How can we give an account to everyone and put enough money in for 1 Coca-Cola as a one-time thing? How could we do it if we wanted to keep doing it as an ongoing operation?

Preemptively:

  1. Yes, this is goofy, a bit insane, and very silly. Your point? It's a great thought experiment on crypto scaling and testing whether conventional finance would do it better or whether crypto has matured enough that this use case demonstrates a nice, benign utility.
  2. Yes, you're going to have to put some accounts in escrow because your government sanctions certain individuals and nobody wants to go to jail over this. The list will vary depending on what country you're in. Assume that nobody doing this wants to break the law and thus you should include a good faith effort to comply with legal requirements.
  3. If you hate Coca-Cola for whatever reason, don't tell me. Feel free to provide a different product or even a service without the need to seek permission. I don't care.
  4. Yes, Coca-Cola would have to cooperate with this. The less work they would need to do, the better for the purpose of the scenario. Making one account under Coca-Cola's control and have them manage the hard parts is cheating. Since they're ok with playing around with NFTs (as of 2021), they are not going to be too hard a sell if they need only accept money and give out soda.
1442
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/flowers_at_dusk on 2023-12-22 17:59:17+00:00.

1443
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/TMLutas on 2023-12-22 18:01:16+00:00.


So, a little background. There was this 1970s commercial. It was famous for the older crowd. If you have no idea, somebody put it on YouTube (of course):

This was impossible back in the 1970s. Is it still impossible today given the progress we've made in technology?

Here's the destination for the money, the world's population:

How can we give an account to everyone and put enough money in for 1 Coca-Cola as a one-time thing? How could we do it if we wanted to keep doing it as an ongoing operation?

Preemptively:

  1. Yes, this is goofy, a bit insane, and very silly. Your point? It's a great thought experiment on crypto scaling and testing whether conventional finance would do it better or whether crypto has matured enough that this use case demonstrates a nice, benign utility.
  2. Yes, you're going to have to put some accounts in escrow because your government sanctions certain individuals and nobody wants to go to jail over this. The list will vary depending on what country you're in. Assume that nobody doing this wants to break the law and thus you should include a good faith effort to comply with legal requirements.
  3. If you hate Coca-Cola for whatever reason, don't tell me. Feel free to provide a different product or even a service without the need to seek permission. I don't care.
  4. Yes, Coca-Cola would have to cooperate with this. The less work they would need to do, the better for the purpose of the scenario. Making one account under Coca-Cola's control and have them manage the hard parts is cheating. Since they're ok with playing around with NFTs (as of 2021), they are not going to be too hard a sell if they need only accept money and give out soda.
1444
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/flowers_at_dusk on 2023-12-22 17:59:17+00:00.

1445
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/Allions1 on 2023-12-22 17:39:09+00:00.

1446
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/flowers_at_dusk on 2023-12-22 17:59:17+00:00.

1447
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/Allions1 on 2023-12-22 17:39:09+00:00.

1448
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/Allions1 on 2023-12-22 17:39:09+00:00.

1449
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/RattyDAVE on 2023-12-22 17:06:09+00:00.

1450
 
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/cryptocurrency by /u/RattyDAVE on 2023-12-22 17:06:09+00:00.

view more: ‹ prev next ›