Endless War

“During that big attack by Iran on Israel, the U.S. didn’t send any F-35s. We sent F-15s. Why didn’t we use F-35s to defend against the Iranian attack?” he asked.

Russia is also shy in using its 5th gen aircraft. Expensive asset + expensive flight time maintenance, and embarassment of failures are likely similar factors.

As to boasts about F35 use vs Iran, there were reports that Israel was planning a 3 wave attack, and that it stopped at first wave, had reports of planes getting "lit up" with radar/air defenses. Maybe Israel are just nice guys showing restraint.

long interview on article: https://youtube.com/live/kWDjhLBn4YM

That the basics of the plan are categorically unacceptable to Russia is given. Unmentioned by Ritter, is the biggest objection: Not only keep Ukraine aligned with NATO with military funding, but extend their terrorist shelling activities that caused the war, with NATO "peacekeeper" troops who have only demonstrated evil intent towards Russia so far.

Ritter does a bad job with countering "increased sanctions threat", and threats of a $45/barrel price cap instead of current $60.

The US is a bank masquerading as a country as a parallel to accusing Russia of being a gas station masquerading as a country. Russia is the most self sustained country in the world, and war needs massive oil/diesel use, and Russia has banned exports of diesel because it needs so much (in addition to giving consumers a break on prices). Projecting that Russia depends on same BS that runs US economy, is the false faith in sanctions. Most of the world does not blame the war on Russia, or apply US ordered sanctions.

Ritter's bad argument on oil price is simply that if Russia wanted to sell all of its oil to Europe for $60/barrel, then Brent crude would trade at $60. Russia simply has other global customers, as well as its massive internal needs.

Actual peace in Ukraine is only hope for European people. Their demonic pig fucker rulers need to be deposed, if they would prefer war against Russia just because there exists a brainwashed cohort that enjoys being pig fucked, while simultaneously resisting US increased subjugation, or worse, volunteering increased US subjugation.

The US was never anyone's friend.

There is no essential minerals/oil needed for world at high cost development projects.

Joint Russia/China coast guard exercises in Russian waters somewhat close to Alaska is not a threat on Greenland or Arctic. The furthest Arctic point from Russia and China. Shipping routes to Europe from China can/want to use Russian Arctic waters. Shipping routes to eastern North America would use Canadian waters.

NATO controlled bases in Greenland welcome more US investment/resources. Offensive capability on populated Russia is closest from European NATO/US bases. Therefore, only national security interest for US in Greenland is to abandon NATO and directly threaten Europe.

Withdrawing US troops from Europe is Europe's liberation. Demanding tribute for US occupation troops needs to be refused.

Europe needs closer alliance with Russia instead of supporting a destroyed Ukraine purchased even more by Blackrock.

Joe Biden set three objectives for the U.S. response. Ukraine’s victory was never among them. The phrase the White House used to describe its mission at the time—supporting Ukraine “for as long as it takes”

Demonizing Russia is first rule in explaining everything, even if Russia DGAFs about Finland internet.

While video opens up with "OBL did it because he admitted to doing it after initially denying he did it" as proof he did it,...

OBL on CIA payroll since the 1980s for Afghan destabilization, and never off the payroll, was raided next door to ally Pakistan ISI headquarters. If CIA and Muslim word heroizing him if he takes credit, there is incentive to take credit. Especially if denial does nothing to remove him from guilt by US preferred narrative list.

9/11 was sophisticated to the point that CIA/Mossad/KSA level of organization. That hijackers had profiles of KSA/Royal family supported/funded pilot training programs, and 9/11 report censors anything embarrassing to KSA, who are strong US allies and best weapons customer,

Background: Australia has agreed to spend 30% of its GDP on nuclear submarines to protect its trade with China from China.

On Greenland,

It is already a NATO colony with military bases. NATO would not object to more US presence as part of NATO mission. EU/Denmark would not object to FDI from US for resource exploitation.

The only possible reason for a US "national security" claim is that as a prelude to withdrawing from NATO, it needs to threaten EU further. Any economic exploitation is BS prohibitive due to lack of infrastructure, but if it happens it must be without fair compensation.

quote from US empire pigfucker in charge of destroying Europe:

NATO’s Rutte said last month that any increase in spending must be paired with greater efficiency, focusing on innovation and joint purchasing. He said NATO must “get rid of that idiotic system” where each member sets national requirements, which “makes it almost impossible to buy together, to have joint procurement.” If NATO doesn’t boost efficiency, he said, “even with 4% you can’t defend yourselves.”

This is a call to buy everything from US. He's also said that Europe must sacrifice all social institutions to boost war on Russia spending.

Under Trump logic that any country that has a trade deficit is taking advantage of US and must submit harder to US, surely giving power to a nazi ethnostate that doesn't control US politicians (Israel is special), but sucks up US budget resources is ineligible/untrustable to be included in a mutual protection alliance with US.

EU can choose/double down on its pathetic colonial subservience by being unsupported in its war on Russia, while Ukraine is sold more to Blackrock, and EU spends more on US weapons and energy.

As democracy fetishists, they deserve what they "choose".

Trump wants Greenland for same purpose, but buying nordstream is path to mark up Russian gas such that LNG is competitive.

Von Der Layen to support EU extortion of course.

Promising to buy US climate terrorist energy is subjugating Europe into more expensive climate destruction. Immediate response quote from CIA captured subhuman traitorous pigshit:

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told reporters that replacing Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports with U.S. volumes would be cheaper, and that the EU would look to engage and negotiate on the matter when Trump takes office in 2025.

Not only does Russia have a surplus of NG, from sanctioned exports, and a shorter shipping distance, with supposed price caps from Europe, it also used to provide NG without the expense and emissions of liquifying it. Qatar and ME also has a shipping advantage over US. Lying pig fucker's lies are conflicting with each other.

This happens to be the traitorous pig fucker that will be negotiating on behalf of EU with its colonial master.