this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
7 points (100.0% liked)

Photography

0 readers
49 users here now

All things photography. Share your own original photos, your questions, your inspiration.

Rules

Share your own original photography. No NSFW images. Be Nice.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

House of the Temple,. Washington, DC, 2023.

All the secret pixels at https://www.flickr.com/photos/mattblaze/53288608886

#photography

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (5 children)

@[email protected] I frankly don't understand the point of the XC. It's only slightly smaller than the XT with the 23, but you can't interchange the lenses and you get no movements (granted, not much movement is possible with the 23 anyway).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (4 children)

@[email protected] it's smaller enough that it could fit in my normal day bag, and wideness solves the need for any shift

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

@[email protected] Yeah, but if you just get an XT and a 23mm, you get the ability to interchange lenses and use movements without much extra size. I guess someone is buying XCs, I just can't figure out who it's for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

@[email protected] yeah, the portability is really the only justification. It's a modern Hasselblad SWC, there is a market, but very small. I do expect I'll end up buying one once I own an IQ4

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

@[email protected] annoyingly, they don’t seem to (currently) sell it without a back. If they did, and I didn’t already have a 23, I’d consider buying an XC sans back instead of a 23 in the XT/cambo mount.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

@[email protected] they do, but only started doing so a few months after launch

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)