this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13949 readers
66 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did not read the original research but if the analysis is based on sensor data from the buoy I'd say it is rather more likely that this is rogue data - a sensor or transmission failure - than a 'rogue wave out of the blue'.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"This work only used data which had received a quality control check and the record appears correct from 01/01/2010 to 15/08/2021. Any other suspicious data sections were removed. Due to outages in service and erroneous records the time series from the MEDS buoys are variable in length and do not necessarily span the full 11 year" https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-05671-4

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Well, it doesn't mean you were wrong - only that the authors did consider that possibility & attempt to rule it out. (Though being a Nature paper, its unlikely it would've reached publication stage without that issue being dealt with.)

Also you have my respect for taking in new information with a positive attitude!