People Twitter

5674 readers

1698 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1033

Corruption (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

61 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Mastodon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If the numbers are true it costed him less than 0.1% of his wealth which is surprising how little it takes. Would you spend 0.1% of your wealth to elect a President and gain a government post that will bring you more wealth? Would you spend 1% of your wealth to become insanely rich? 10%?

In the society where power is measured by wealth ultra rich should not exist. Or better such society should not exist.

Also Musk wasn't even the biggest donor. And Harris was okay with this whole thing, she also received enormous donations. Who was against ultra rich? Bernie Sanders. No wonder he was sacked despite popular support.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

nah, I like the Bannana man's method better. reference- Bannana man in honduras

load more comments (1 replies)