this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2023
5 points (64.7% liked)
World News
33613 readers
780 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That is indeed a thing, although I agree that "age" is maybe not the best term for it. This only somewhat related article explains well that is meant by that.
Thanks for the link.
I guess I don't understand if there is a difference between "aged immune system" and "weak immune system". Aged, as I would define it, can't be reversed. Otherwise it would just be temporally weak and can improve to the typical state of immunity of similar aged peers.
I guess they don't really know that as well.
Indeed it is implied that these changes are irreversible and at best can be slowed down. But there is still a lot of open research in this area AFAIK.
I agree that aging implies this, but apparently they don't know. That's why I wonder why they're calling it like that.
Just anecdotal, but... I have generalized anxiety, and sometimes I have high stress, while some times low stress. I do know that my immune system responds to that. Which is also what they're talking about in this article.
I just fail to see any reason to call it "aging", when it implies something they don't know.
As far as I can tell the current science sees two overlapping effects there, one temporary weakening effect that can be reversed and one they describe as accelerated aging or sanding-down of the immune system that is pretty much irreversible without something like a bone marrow transplant or such.