this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
99 points (99.0% liked)

Wikipedia

2054 readers
255 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Mostly (most notably minus Japan) a map of former UK colonies. At least the ones still a colony when the car became a thing.

[–] SpaceCowboy 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Kinda the opposite really. They had horses and wagons and carriages which needed rules about which side of the road to drive on long before cars were invented. The left side was the natural side for horsey reasons and most of the world got around on the left until Napoleon came around and forced mainland Europe to switch.

So the map depicts in red the European countries conquered by Napoleon and their colonies as well as the countries later influenced by the US.

[–] Robomekk 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What sort of horsey reasons? Now I’m curious.

[–] SpaceCowboy 2 points 2 months ago

Whoops I took a break for a while. Anyway, you always get on a horse from the left side because back in the day a right handed person would have their sword on their left hip. Getting on the horse from the right side would likely result in the horse getting jabbed with the sword. If you're riding down the right side of the road you'd have to go out onto the road to get on your horse. But on the left you can more easily mount and dismount if you gotta take a piss or whatever.

Also if you're passing some one on the left, your weapon is in your right hand, so you're ready to stab if need be. Of course it was customary to raise your right hand to show you had no weapon in it when you met someone, but you gotta be ready to draw and fight. Fucking bandits are everywhere ya know. So keep an eye on the other guy's right hand as you pass by, just in case he tries something.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)