this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
177 points (97.8% liked)
196
17133 readers
2562 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts require verification from the mods first
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"vigilante justice is bad" and "no one has the right to decide who lives and who dies" mfs the second vigilante justice happens:
ITT: "vigilante justice is bad and i can no way condone it" wink
vigilante justice is the only justice when the worst crimes are legal
It is bad. We have a society of laws and justice that's supposed to prevent the need for vigilantism. That system has broken down and favors people of wealth, and thus you have a return of vigilantes being seen as heroes.
Let’s talk about it.
trolley problem
vigilante justice is bad because you are enforcing a personal rule of law. the uhc ceo was enforcing many of his own rules through the company's own treatment of claims and its effects on governing entities. there was no justice, simply a warning that noone is less mortal than the people they commodify.