this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2021
30 points (96.9% liked)

Asklemmy

44656 readers
938 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 3 years ago (3 children)

the fact that nobody knows how to email anymore. nobody knows how to bottom-post, nobody knows how to trim quoted messages, nobody knows that you should always use plain-text email.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 3 years ago (1 children)

i would add blame to Outlook and Gmail being predominant "client" that seem to push top-post replies versus the obviously superior-for-reading-flow bottom-posting.

i try to plain text reply as often as I can but having the ability to embolden important text is too beneficial

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago (1 children)

yes, i addressed that in another reply. personally, for emphasizing things in plaintext, i use **Markdown**, which is actually pretty much universally understood.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

The worst is when markdown is automatically converted into rich text.

automatically

*automatically* ... there we go.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Wait, why should email always be plain text? HTML allows for formatting, images, links, and tables, which are crucial when communicating at work.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 3 years ago (1 children)

One may posit that your images, tables, and formatting may be better served as an attachment or linked webpage.

https://useplaintext.email/#why-plaintext

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago

Thanks for the info. I like my colors and formatting, but I'll look into it further.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 children)

first, security: the web stack is almost impossible to implement securely. there will be vulnerabilities, which will be mercilessly exploited. second, privacy: tracking pixels and other spyware are everywhere in emails. third, accessibility: plaintext emails are a piece of cake for screen readers and braille displays, while HTML emails are a very mixed bag; and plaintext is universal. every email client, no matter how basic or esoteric, is able to display it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Doesn't blocking external content in emails (like images) prevent the spyware from working?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

yes, but there are still the problems of security and accessibility. blocking external content is a band-aid.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago

although a lot of this is email clients' fault. the developers of said email clients were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didnโ€™t stop to think if they should, and now we're all stuck with bad defaults.