this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
-24 points (26.9% liked)

Linuxsucks

259 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. FOSS advocates and Linux evangelists aren't welcome. -We ask that you block us.
  2. Moderation is heavy handed. Try to stay on topic (that is LINUXSUCKS!).
  3. No Complaining Mute the sub if users, content, or rules bother you *it's ok to report rule violations

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Appimages are the solution I'm aware of, but are scarce.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Even if you, as a developer, create a completely static executable file, there's no guarantee that glibc will have backwards compatibility.

Creates a "completely static" binary. Still links dynamically to glibc instead of using musl or some other libc. Blames Linux.