this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
98 points (98.0% liked)

Australian News

589 readers
18 users here now

A place to share and discuss news relating to Australia and Australians.

Rules
  1. Follow the aussie.zone rules
  2. Keep discussions civil and respectful
  3. Exclude profanity from post titles
  4. Exclude excessive profanity from comments
  5. Satire is allowed, however post titles must be prefixed with [satire]
Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Banner: ABC

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In short:

A Queensland girl sustained significant burns when wind blew sparks onto a jumper purchased from Temu, which ignited "in a split second".

Temu recalled the jumper for failing to meet mandatory safety standards.

What's next?

CHOICE is calling for more proactive protections for Australian consumers, in line with international legislation.


"She can't even watch a candle be lit now on her birthday cake; she screams. Fire scares her."

The young girl spent eight weeks in hospital in Brisbane undergoing skin graft operations.

She faces another decade of skin grafts as her body grows.

The ACCC said Australian consumer legislation did not contain a "direct prohibition on the supply of unsafe products".

Since 2005 CHOICE has been calling for the introduction of a general safety provision (GSP), which would legislate a requirement for suppliers to ensure their products were safe before they could be sold to consumers.

"Unfortunately, Australia's product safety regime is reactive and it can take someone being seriously injured or killed for a product to be recalled," Mr Kelly said.

"The current reactive, largely voluntary, approach to product safety is clearly not working."

A 2017 review of Australian consumer law also recommended the introduction of a GSP, saying it would match other OECD countries, including the UK and Canada, which had responded to the proliferation of online shopping platforms.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

No. That is a fucked up way to look at this. It is a good thing that regulations exist which means I don't have to be an electrical engineer, microbiologist, thin film chemist, soil scientist, hydrological engineer etc etc in order to avoid being hurt by shoddy products.

People who skirt regulations and sell inferior goods are bad people and the blame lies with them. There are heaps of cheap things that won't cause harm and people have sold expensive shit that fucking kill you (cosmetics is a hellscape). Your stance is one of the extreme privilege of living in a world made safe by hard workers trying to fix things after terrible crimes by awful people.