this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
90 points (98.9% liked)
World News
553 readers
838 users here now
Rules:
- Be a decent person
- No spam
- Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.
Other communities of interest:
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It is impossible to be 100% certain that someone commited a crime; in order to be found legally guilty in many countries, the standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt" and not "zero doubt."
I am against this idea for the same reason as I am against the death penalty in the US, along with the reason you already stated in your comment (Red Scare in the US, gulags in the USSR, China, North Korea, etc.). 4% of people on death row in the United States are innocent.
Also let's be real, if the person who commited the crime was extremely rich, then they wouldn't be paraded around shit.
I definitely understand the want to bring back tarring and feathering or public gallows, but there's a reason society moved on from those ideas; too much mob mentality in those situations, and there isn't a way to 100% guarantee that the person being punished is a criminal. Now granted, it's not like convicted criminals are treated well today outside of very specific cases like in Norway.