this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
916 points (96.9% liked)

196

17071 readers
1171 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
916
rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Guys, at this rate I don't think the revolution's going to happen anytime soon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Maybe I’m in a bubble, but I have yet to see anyone who’s not genuinely a tankie being accused of such.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ive seen people be called tankies for not supporting Kamala and opposing Liberal Democracy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

for not supporting Kamala

That’s wild. I’ve never heard that take and have a difficult time believing that it is common.

opposing Liberal Democracy

What alternative were they in favor of?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s wild. I’ve never heard that take and have a difficult time believing that it is common.

World users were literally calling anyone who critiqued Kamala Russian bots, were you not paying attention for the last several months?

What alternative were they in favor of?

Depends, some leftists support a workers democracy, im personally an Anarcho Syndicalist

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

World users

Ah. I think I see where the problem is. I believe my instance defederated from lemmy.world a while back.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

You arent missing out on much

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've seen conservatives lob the word tankie around before like they do with other scary sounding political words. But not here on lemmy. "Tankie" has a very precise meaning on lemmy that everyone here seems to understand, despite a few tankies trying to gaslight people into thinking the term has "lost it's meaning".

[–] humanspiral 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

For those who don't know what it means, what is "clear definition of tankie"?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

someone who claims to be leftist but tacitly or gleefully supports authoritarianism, imperialism, or violent repression. Many are easily identifiable by their pointing to places that are not The West™️ and smoothing over, apologizing for, or denying, blatant horrors on the basis that they are unfriendly with the west. sometimes called red fascists.

It's actually important to ostracize these people as they are obviously the most blatant opportunists in leftist movements looking to implement authoritarian repressive regimes.

[–] humanspiral 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

claims to be leftist but tacitly or gleefully supports authoritarianism, imperialism, or violent repression.

including those resisting US evil? Not supporting a war on Russia is tankie, because being too stupid to not understand we the people lose, and Russia needs to defend itself, is not as important as believing US propaganda that Russian leadership is evil for defending itself?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

on the brightside ya'll normally just can't resist outing yourselves.

[–] humanspiral 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is there a name for leftists that believe everyone deserves every war the US tells them is a "strategic imperative"? Even the ones where they use motivated nazis and very illiberal Islamist rulers?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

yes. "Western leftist"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Spoken like a true lib who hasn't grabbed a history book in their lives. You have done exactly ZERO study of this so-called "authoritarianism", its characteristics, actual comparisons with western systems, and the reasons for certain degrees of oppression in different systems. Your entire analysis is vibes-based, and doesn't hold up to the slightest scrutiny, and leads you to being on the side of the US Department of State propaganda on 99% of occasions. Remember, people called us tankies 20 years ago for opposing the invasion of Iraq, because "Saddam is a rabid dog".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

really searching for straws to grasp here eh?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"I'm a leftist, and I proudly support 0 historical leftist movements which actually achieved anything"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

wild leaps of logic, care to show your work? i could use entertainment

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Tell me one (1) leftist movement that actually achieved significant social change that you support

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i think the AANES have been very impressive in their efforts, personally. Funny how you dodged answering for how you got "doesnt support leftist movements" for defining tankie. 🤔

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lmao, the Rojava are a minor movement in a very restricted area, and will exist for as long as the US is interested in their presence in the region.

how you got "doesnt support leftist movements" for defining tankie

Hey, I'm not the one denying every socialist experiment in history and decrying it as "authoritarian" without having done any serious study on it, and sharing the same point of view on it with libs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

you have yet to explain where you are actually hearing that lmfao. unless, of course, being against violent repression and fascism as a rule somehow insults your sensibilities.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bringing up fucking rojava, that's how I know. No support for socialists who managed to change the world like the Bolsheviks or the Cuban revolution, or socialists like Gaddafi and Nasser.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You roll your eyes, yet you think yourself smarter and better than all revolutionaries who existed and succeeded...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i am mostly rolling my eyes at the self tells of me saying fascism is unconditionally bad and you taking personal offense at that and looking for leftist purity tests lmao.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fascism is unconditionally bad, but the term "red fash" is ahistorical, illogical and made up right wing bullshit to push people away from communism

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

those darn 1920s anarchists and communists, the most famous users of the term red fash, notorious right wingers trying to push people away from communism. 😂 so ahistorical.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Winning is authoritarian. Everything makes more sense when you understand that this is where the opposition to "authoritarianism" comes from.

It's how you can denounce movements that win, while suggesting the left uses tactics that lose. It is a meaningless word that means successful deviation from the desires of the West.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Bingo. The only "worthy" leftist movements in these people's minds are the ones that failed, because they weren't tested under real world conditions. Anarchism in the Spanish civil war, Allende, those are fine to glorify because they ultimately lost, and that way you can keep your moral high ground and standards by worshipping an idealised version of them rather than real-life socialism with material and historical costraints

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

In a nutshell, alternative-imperialists with a leftist bent. They're hypocrites. "Imperialism is evil...with these exceptions, those empires are cool".

It's frustrating trying to talk with tankies, because really I agree with practically all of their criticisms of the US and a few criticisms of NATO and the West at large. But then that gets turned around into a justification for X formerly-socialist country drafting soldiers to invade sovereign country "Y" with practically unanimous resistance, and I just don't see how the hell that's supposed to help the working class of either state.