cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/36172951
Legality
this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
259 points (99.2% liked)
Liberty Hub
376 readers
72 users here now
- No Discrimination, this includes usage of slurs or other language intended to promote bigotry
- No defending oppressive systems or organizations
- No uncivil or rude comments to other users
- Discussion, not debate. This community is exclusively for genuine logical debate, any comments using whataboutism or similar will be removed.
- No genocide denial or support for genocidal entities. Anyone that supports the mass murder of civilians will be banned.
These guidelines are meant to allow open discussion and ensure leftists and post-leftists can have a voice. If you are here to learn, then welcome! Just remember that if you're not a part of the left (Liberals don't count) then you are a visitor, please do not speak over our members.
Matrix server: https://matrix.to/#/#libertyhub:matrix.org
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I do actually agree, but because in that ideal world we don't need laws. Where context and society can actually solve issues and talk about it.
Imagine if we had a world where breaking morals had a societal response - I'm sure you can, because we do. To some effects an extreme and deadly reaction.
Laws don't reflect morality, culture or context. They try with courts and yes, mob mentality could seemingly go badly - but isn't that because law will punish vigilantism?
We know what's wrong and right, the law does not.