this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
64 points (85.6% liked)

Australia

3742 readers
211 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

No one is asking you to feel guilty. We're asking you to acknowledge the past, and to acknowledge the privilege that brings you. To use that to help forge a path of reconciliation forward together as a nation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

I'm all for that. But I think many people feel more responsible for righting the wrongs of their ancestors than of other wrongs. I think we should help all those struggling, independent of who caused it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

To use that to help forge a path of reconciliation forward together as a nation.

Not having a go here, genuinely. I genuinely want to know: what does this mean? I voted yes, but it was a lot of vague comments and a voice to parliament all sounds great. but no ones ever said "here's 3 simple things we should be working on".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"here's 3 simple things we should be working on".

Three things to work on would be truth, treaty and voice? Those aren't simple though.

I think the nation accepting the voice would have been a step towards reconciliation, since it would have been a sign showing the nation accepts wrongs that exist in its history.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

no, they are buzz words that could apply to a number of things given different context. A list of actionable items makes things achievable. Voice is dead in the water, Murdoch and limp dicked support from the albo government saw to that. So what can we actually DO to help here.

Thats the part I never see articulated.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They really aren't buzzwords, it's a short way of describing what the Uluru statement proposed. The issue is that the failure of the voice both encouraged the right wing to shit on indigenous issues and tell labor that it's not worth the political capital to touch you indigenous issues.

If you want concrete policy goals then you could look at the royal commission into aboriginal deaths in custody and email your MP to act on the recommendations. Or see if you get anything out of the reports from the yoorrook commission if you're in vic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Who's denying any of that though?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Sometimes it's not even about denial of what happened, but rather a mindset that the past doesn't affect the present anymore.

I often-enough hear people saying things along the line of, well, past generations took the land but society is better and less racist now, we collectively apologised, and my family weren't even here at the time, so we have no obligation to do anything now. Almost like if my dad stole your car ten years ago, died after, and I say well I've never stolen anything in my life, it was my dad's car, this car is mine, stop complaining about the past. It doesn't make sense to start acting like equal treatment is fair after so much is stolen and so little is given back. But I know people who believe morality is that own individual behaviour, whether they are doing hurtful acts, and disregard their own position in society, how they got there and who suffered to allow that to happen.

Guilt isn't what people are asking for, guilt actually doesn't do anything useful, but rather we need people to realise that it doesn't matter that we personally didn't commit massacres and seize land, because the consequences of those acts still disadvantage current generations of the victims, and it's not resolved if we dismiss the consequences as someone else's sins.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Many. Pretending that you don't benefit from past criminality is passively doing the same thing which seems to be the default of a lot of (most?) white westerners.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Criminality is a tricky one. What was legal in the past may not be legal nor ethically sound today.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Criminal or not the golden rule has been around for a long time. Their actions were and are immoral, dare I say evil. People know that which is reprehensible, it's those things that they do not wish to be done to them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Lots of people eat meat today. I can imagine a future where this is seen as immoral and not following the golden rule. But for some reason, humans currently choose not to apply the golden rule to animals.

Similarly in the past, they didn't apply it to indigenous people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Criminal or not the golden rule has been around for a long time

So have wars over land

Their actions were and are immoral, dare I say evil

Welcome to the world, there's a reason we signed up to a 300 billion dollar deal for some submarines and it's not because we enjoy the look of them