this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
39 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

1840 readers
610 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Exclusive: In-vitro gametes are viewed as the holy grail of fertility research

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Does anyone know if having a baby with yourself carries the same genetic risks as breeding with first cousins?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Good question. I thought it would be more like having a clone of yourself, but maybe that's the same issue? Copy of a copy?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You’re not wrong, but the technology is coming.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The child would just be a genetic clone of the parent. There would be no change in genetic risks.