this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
44 points (94.0% liked)
SpaceflightMemes
716 readers
132 users here now
A Lemmy analogue to r/SpaceXMasterRace.
Related communities for serious posts and discussion.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I was all in on space exploration. I followed the grasshopper. I watched the early landing attempts. I eagerly watched the Boca Chica developments. I watched the first full stack starship lift off...
And suddenly I had an ache in my gut. I instantly realized this was never about space exploration. This is about being the first guy in a new area of resource extraction. This is Musk pushing to be the first Spaniard in the New World to plunder all the riches before the next guy can get there. The "No planet B" is just a bullshit line to mask the unfettered greed that actually drives Musk.
By the time we have starship flying as planned, the earth will be a burning husk less habitable than the destination.
The rocket is reusable to increase profit. It does not "help the environment". Methane burns "clean", but only when it burns. When it's leaked by venting, engine startup and shut down, and RUD's it probably classifies as "the most potent greenhouse gas" injected into a region of atmosphere that's never really seen pollution yet.
Yes, the engineering is incredible. But I can't help but think of the associated costs.
I never realized people thought the ultimate goal behind those funding space travel was anything other than to get to more resources. You can see it in explanations of long term goals of spending on a space program in propaganda videos going back more than 50 years.
My hesitation with the first part of this take (not defending the guy) is that there isn't really an economic reason to get people to Mars. If the goal was asteroid mining, that might be different.
They also recondense a lot of Methane instead of just venting or burning it.
I'm not talking about the launch tower, I'm talking about the rocket. You can watch the live stream and see puffs of vapour regularly. It being a rocket there are very few things that gas could be. Some of it is nitrogen, sure, but the thing is 95% methane and oxygen and there is certainly very little nitrogen associated with the engines. I'm sure they're not looking to dump it with no regard, unless they carry on with the "autogenous thrusters" which involves using propellant for maneuvering.
As for Mars, I think that's total bullshit. His big idea was to corner the wireless internet market. He used Mars to sell it to us.
A lot of that is water vapor coming off the outside of the chilled tanks, though?
Idk about that Starlink theory. That feels like a conspiracy theory. It feels like it could be right, but I've never seen or heard anything to back it up.
Even if it takes until 2040 to get Starship flying as planned (I think it'll be 2030) the earth will be much more habitable than any other planet in the solar system. It'll stay as such for the foreseeable future - regardless of the climate crisis. Unless we glass the planet in a nuclear war, that is. Which is a great argument for spreading life throughout the stars.