this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
58 points (98.3% liked)
Asklemmy
44687 readers
1135 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
When we want to break hydrocarbon chains we use bases by default. But, I'd not use a base on a bike chain because if it rusts even a little bit it's junk.
For woodworking why is this better than mineral spirits?
I don't know about 'better', but I prefer it for being less fumey, I feel better about occasionally getting some on my skin, and prefer not using petroleum derivatives. I know there's low fume mineral spirits and I've used that for paint cleanup, but i'm not confident it behaves the same for finishes.
That makes sense. I'll give it a try. Thank you for teaching me.